These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan. Khaja WA; Grover S; Kelmenson AT; Ferguson LR; Sambhav K; Chalam KV Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1065-70. PubMed ID: 26109840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam Scheimpflug photography and Visante optical coherence tomography]. Huang JH; Ge LN; Wen DZ; Chen SH; Yu Y; Wang QM Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 23866707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparative study of anterior segment measurement with Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Fu J; Wang X; Li S; Wu G; Wang N Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 45(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 21135897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry. Luo YH; Zhong Q; Ouyang PB; Guo XJ; Duan XC Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22773982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. To Study and Determine the Role of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Corneal and Conjunctival Tumors. Janssens K; Mertens M; Lauwers N; de Keizer RJ; Mathysen DG; De Groot V J Ophthalmol; 2016; 2016():1048760. PubMed ID: 28050274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy. Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of different modes in optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in anterior chamber angle assessment. Wang D; Pekmezci M; Basham RP; He M; Seider MI; Lin SC J Glaucoma; 2009 Aug; 18(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 19680056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes. Yu A; Zhao W; Savini G; Huang Z; Bao F; Lu W; Wang Q; Huang J J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():767012. PubMed ID: 26697213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy versus ultrasound and optical pachymetry for the measurement of corneal thickness. Pierro L; Conforto E; Resti AG; Lattanzio R Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212 Suppl 1():1-3. PubMed ID: 9730734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of central corneal thickness in dogs measured by ultrasound pachymetry and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Martín-Suárez E; Galán A; Morgaz J; Guisado A; Gallardo JM; Gómez-Villamandos RJ Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():13-14. PubMed ID: 29428083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Tam ES; Rootman DS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12842687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry. Lázaro C; Hernández EM; Martínez D; Redondo P Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2013 Feb; 88(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 23433191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy. Zhang Q; Jin W; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 36(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 20494765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements in Normal Eyes Using the Zeiss Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT and Pentacam HR. Baghdasaryan E; Huang X; Marion KM; Tepelus TC; Bagherinia H; Sadda SR; Hsu HY Open Ophthalmol J; 2018; 12():72-83. PubMed ID: 29872486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of corneal thickness in patients with dry eye disease using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Fujimoto K; Inomata T; Okumura Y; Iwata N; Fujio K; Eguchi A; Nagino K; Shokirova H; Karasawa M; Murakami A PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228567. PubMed ID: 32012201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]