These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population. Chouinard PA; Noulty WA; Sperandio I; Landry O Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 23864047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing of the Müller-Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Pepperberg IM; Vicinay J; Cavanagh P Perception; 2008; 37(5):765-81. PubMed ID: 18605149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. Howe CQ; Purves D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Jan; 102(4):1234-9. PubMed ID: 15657142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions. Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The perception of interpersonal distance is distorted by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bunce C; Gray KLH; Cook R Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):494. PubMed ID: 33436801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Müller-Lyer illusion and perception of numerosity. Agostini T; Luccio R Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 1):937-8. PubMed ID: 8084714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: not a change in perceived length. Biegstraaten M; de Grave DD; Brenner E; Smeets JB Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 17146650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Length illusion in fractional Müller-Lyer stimuli: an object-perception approach. Redding GM; Hawley E Perception; 1993; 22(7):819-28. PubMed ID: 8115239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]