158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24349784)
1. The effect of cesarean delivery skin incision approach in morbidly obese women on the rate of classical hysterotomy.
Brocato BE; Thorpe EM; Gomez LM; Wan JY; Mari G
J Pregnancy; 2013; 2013():890296. PubMed ID: 24349784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Association of Skin Incision Type With Postoperative Cesarean Delivery Complications in Morbidly Obese Patients.
Martin J; Gastanaduy M; Nakahara A; Peterson S; Chai M; Mussarat N; Biggio J
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 139(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 34856566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Optimal Cesarean Skin Incision in Patients with Super Obesity.
Seif KE; Goetzinger KR; Turan OM
Am J Perinatol; 2023 Jan; 40(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 35752170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal Incision Selection for Cesarean Delivery of Women with Class III Obesity.
Sutton AL; Sanders LB; Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Edwards RK
Am J Perinatol; 2016 May; 33(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 26692204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body mass index and operative times at cesarean delivery.
Girsen AI; Osmundson SS; Naqvi M; Garabedian MJ; Lyell DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 124(4):684-689. PubMed ID: 25198267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative morbidity in the morbidly obese parturient woman: supraumbilical and low transverse abdominal approaches.
Houston MC; Raynor BD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1033-5. PubMed ID: 10819819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient.
Alanis MC; Villers MS; Law TL; Steadman EM; Robinson CJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):271.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20678746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High transverse skin incisions may reduce wound complications in obese women having cesarean sections: a pilot study.
Walton RB; Shnaekel KL; Ounpraseuth ST; Napolitano PG; Magann EF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(5):781-785. PubMed ID: 29020834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean section prior to 28 weeks' gestation: which type of uterine incision is optimal?
Fischer RL; Schenker D; Gosschalk J
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2024 Dec; 37(1):2358385. PubMed ID: 38887786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.
Giugale LE; Sakamoto S; Yabes J; Dunn SL; Krans EE
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 38(8):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29565193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for classical hysterotomy in twin pregnancies.
Osmundson SS; Garabedian MJ; Yeaton-Massey A; Lyell DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 125(3):643-648. PubMed ID: 25730228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for wound complications in morbidly obese women undergoing primary cesarean delivery.
Thornburg LL; Linder MA; Durie DE; Walker B; Pressman EK; Glantz JC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1544-8. PubMed ID: 22233403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pfannenstiel versus Vertical Skin Incision for Cesarean Delivery in Women with Class III Obesity: A Randomized Trial.
Marrs C; Blackwell S; Hester A; Olson G; Saade GR; Faro J; Pedroza C; Sibai B
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jan; 36(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 30060292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association of skin incision placement during cesarean delivery with wound complications in obese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mccurdy RJ; Felder LA; Saccone G; Edwards RK; Thornburg LL; Marrs C; Conner SN; Strauss R; Berghella V
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jun; 35(12):2311-2323. PubMed ID: 32631122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision?
Tixier H; Thouvenot S; Coulange L; Peyronel C; Filipuzzi L; Sagot P; Douvier S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(9):1049-52. PubMed ID: 19639463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal obesity and major intraoperative complications during cesarean delivery.
Smid MC; Vladutiu CJ; Dotters-Katz SK; Boggess KA; Manuck TA; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):614.e1-614.e7. PubMed ID: 28209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin Incision Selection in Superobese Women Undergoing Cesarean Birth.
Grasch JL; Thompson JL; Alamri LA; Osmundson SS
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Apr; 41(6):778-782. PubMed ID: 35253113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Original Suprapannicular Incision Technique for Cesarean Delivery in the Morbidly Obese Parturient.
Lakhi NA; Williamson K; Moretti ML
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):619-623. PubMed ID: 30095785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of obesity on incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes at cesarean delivery.
Conner SN; Tuuli MG; Longman RE; Odibo AO; Macones GA; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):386.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23727523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
