These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24351149)

  • 1. The influence of protective varnish on the integrity of orthodontic cements.
    Caldeira EM; Izquierdo Ade M; Giacomet F; Sant'Anna EF; Ruellas AC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):45-50. PubMed ID: 24351149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.
    Dziuk Y; Chhatwani S; Möhlhenrich SC; Tulka S; Naumova EA; Danesh G
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247716. PubMed ID: 33635885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer and zinc phosphate cements.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Sep; 10(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 11641841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement.
    Millett D; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1993 May; 20(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 8518265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluoride release from orthodontic band cements-a comparison of two in vitro models.
    Caves GR; Millett DT; Creanor SL; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12615016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Cook PA; Luther F; Youngson CC
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 8670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation.
    Dincer B; Erdinc AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 11990053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of commonly available surface protecting agents in maintaining microhardness of two cements.
    Fatima N; Ali Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Jat SA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 May; 23(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 23673167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements.
    Gemalmaz D; Yoruc B; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 9791796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ex vivo evaluation of resin-modified glass polyalkenoates and polyacid-modified composite resins as orthodontic band cements.
    Knox J; Chye KY; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):323-8; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15608348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of mechanical properties of five cements for orthodontic band cementation.
    Aguiar DA; Ritter DE; Rocha R; Locks A; Borgatto AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 23459769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The performance of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement--a retrospective analysis.
    Millett DT; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 1390577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding of hybrid ionomers and resin cements to modified orthodontic band materials.
    Mennemeyer VA; Neuman P; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 9971924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microhardness of glass carbomer and high-viscous glass Ionomer cement in different thickness and thermo-light curing durations after thermocycling aging.
    Buldur M; Sirin Karaarslan E
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):273. PubMed ID: 31801493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Capsulated versus hand-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements for post retention.
    Mitchell CA; Orr JF; Russell MD
    J Dent; 1998 Jan; 26(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 9479925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.