These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24351175)

  • 1. Complexity of continuous glucose monitoring data in critically ill patients: continuous glucose monitoring devices, sensor locations, and detrended fluctuation analysis methods.
    Signal M; Thomas F; Shaw GM; Chase JG
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1492-506. PubMed ID: 24351175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: Results of an Emergent Pilot Study.
    Sadhu AR; Serrano IA; Xu J; Nisar T; Lucier J; Pandya AR; Patham B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 33063556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis to Determine Patient Condition: A Review.
    Thomas F; Signal M; Chase JG
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1327-35. PubMed ID: 26134835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glycemic variability and glucose complexity in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data.
    Brunner R; Adelsmayr G; Herkner H; Madl C; Holzinger U
    Crit Care; 2012 Oct; 16(5):R175. PubMed ID: 23031322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuous glucose monitors prove highly accurate in critically ill children.
    Bridges BC; Preissig CM; Maher KO; Rigby MR
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(5):R176. PubMed ID: 20925914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
    Pleus S; Schoemaker M; Morgenstern K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Link M; Zschornack E; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 25852074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of the medtronic sof-sensor and enlite glucose sensors in inpatient studies of individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Calhoun P; Lum J; Beck RW; Kollman C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Sep; 15(9):758-61. PubMed ID: 23725474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm.
    Keenan DB; Cartaya R; Mastrototaro JJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 4(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 20167174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations.
    Leelarathna L; English SW; Thabit H; Caldwell K; Allen JM; Kumareswaran K; Wilinska ME; Nodale M; Haidar A; Evans ML; Burnstein R; Hovorka R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 24180327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and Feasibility of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients After Abdominal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation.
    Voglová Hagerf B; Protus M; Nemetova L; Mraz M; Kieslichova E; Uchytilova E; Indrova V; Lelito J; Girman P; Haluzík M; Franekova J; Svirlochova V; Klonoff DC; Kohn MA; Jabor A
    Diabetes Care; 2024 Jun; 47(6):956-963. PubMed ID: 38412005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
    Zueger T; Diem P; Mougiakakou S; Stettler C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jul; 14(7):583-8. PubMed ID: 22512266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of the Enlite 6-day glucose sensor with guardian and Veo calibration algorithms.
    Keenan DB; Mastrototaro JJ; Zisser H; Cooper KA; Raghavendhar G; Lee SW; Yusi J; Bailey TS; Brazg RL; Shah RV
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Mar; 14(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22145851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) or Blood Glucose Monitoring (BGM): Interactions and Implications.
    Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 12(4):873-879. PubMed ID: 29648465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in pediatric patients during and after cardiac surgery.
    Piper HG; Alexander JL; Shukla A; Pigula F; Costello JM; Laussen PC; Jaksic T; Agus MS
    Pediatrics; 2006 Sep; 118(3):1176-84. PubMed ID: 16951013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Nondiabetic Participants: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
    Shah VN; DuBose SN; Li Z; Beck RW; Peters AL; Weinstock RS; Kruger D; Tansey M; Sparling D; Woerner S; Vendrame F; Bergenstal R; Tamborlane WV; Watson SE; Sherr J
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2019 Oct; 104(10):4356-4364. PubMed ID: 31127824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of an open access software for calculating glucose variability parameters of a continuous glucose monitoring system applied at pediatric intensive care unit.
    Marics G; Lendvai Z; Lódi C; Koncz L; Zakariás D; Schuster G; Mikos B; Hermann C; Szabó AJ; Tóth-Heyn P
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Apr; 14():37. PubMed ID: 25907677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of a novel noninvasive transdermal continuous glucose monitor in critically ill patients.
    Saur NM; England MR; Menzie W; Melanson AM; Trieu MQ; Berlin J; Hurley J; Krystyniak K; Kongable GL; Nasraway SA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 8(5):945-50. PubMed ID: 24876448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analyzing Complexity and Fractality of Glucose Dynamics in a Pregnant Woman with Type 2 Diabetes under Treatment.
    Chen X; Wang D; Lin J; Zhang T; Deng S; Huang L; Jin Y; Chen C; Zhang Z; Zheng J; Sun B; Bogdan P; Zhang XD
    Int J Biol Sci; 2019; 15(11):2373-2380. PubMed ID: 31595155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.