946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24351610)
1. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.
Neher T
Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():391. PubMed ID: 25538547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 25166628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
