1082 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24351612)
21. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children.
Glista D; Scollie S; Sulkers J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1765-87. PubMed ID: 22615475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids.
Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):405-18. PubMed ID: 19778388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment.
Rudner M; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 21545768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Study of benefit and of acclimatization in recent users of hearing aids].
Amorim RM; Almeida Kd
Pro Fono; 2007; 19(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 17461346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
Silman S; Silverman CA; Emmer MB; Gelfand SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Oleson J; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P
Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):60S-75S. PubMed ID: 26731160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
