145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24351981)
21. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT.
Makeev A; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081904. PubMed ID: 23927318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison between MAP and postprocessed ML for image reconstruction in emission tomography when anatomical knowledge is available.
Nuyts J; Baete K; Bequé D; Dupont P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 15889553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of lesion detectability in Bayesian emission reconstruction with nonstationary object variability.
Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):321-9. PubMed ID: 15027525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Initial assessment of image quality for low-dose PET: evaluation of lesion detectability.
Schaefferkoetter JD; Yan J; Townsend DW; Conti M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):5543-56. PubMed ID: 26134119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection performance analysis for time-of-flight PET.
Cao N; Huesman RH; Moses WW; Qi J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6931-50. PubMed ID: 21048292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Performance of MAP reconstruction for hot lesion detection in whole-body PET/CT: an evaluation with human and numerical observers.
Nuyts J; Michel C; Brepoels L; De Ceuninck L; Deroose C; Goffin K; Mottaghy FM; Stroobants S; Riet JV; Verscuren R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jan; 28(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19116189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.
Visvikis D; Griffiths D; Costa DC; Bomanji J; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1050-6. PubMed ID: 15846487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Task-based detectability in CT image reconstruction by filtered backprojection and penalized likelihood estimation.
Gang GJ; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081902. PubMed ID: 25086533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Volumetric model and human observer comparisons of tumor detection for whole-body positron emission tomography.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
Acad Radiol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):637-48. PubMed ID: 15172366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Towards coronary plaque imaging using simultaneous PET-MR: a simulation study.
Petibon Y; El Fakhri G; Nezafat R; Johnson N; Brady T; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(5):1203-22. PubMed ID: 24556608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Theoretical study of lesion detectability of MAP reconstruction using computer observers.
Qi J; Huesman RH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 11513032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Task-Based Regularization Design for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Cone-Beam CT.
Dang H; Stayman JW; Xu J; Sisniega A; Zbijewski W; Wang X; Foos DH; Aygun N; Koliatsos VE; Siewerdsen JH
Conf Proc Int Conf Image Form Xray Comput Tomogr; 2016 Jul; 2016():557-560. PubMed ID: 28367540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Zhao B; Qin Z; Hao X; Liang M; Xie J; Li S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):224-233. PubMed ID: 33683004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benefits of Using a Spatially-Variant Penalty Strength With Anatomical Priors in PET Reconstruction.
Tsai YJ; Schramm G; Ahn S; Bousse A; Arridge S; Nuyts J; Hutton BF; Stearns CW; Thielemans K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jan; 39(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 31144629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
