297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24352939)
1. Prohibition on assisting a suicide is interference with rights of severely disabled people, UK Supreme Court is told.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7589. PubMed ID: 24352939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The quiet battle for the heart of liberty--a victory for the cautious: Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997).
Melchoir JA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):1359-86. PubMed ID: 16211745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Recent case law about the right to die].
Bascuñán R A
Rev Med Chil; 2016 Apr; 144(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 27401380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Death with dignity in Montana.
Dallner JE; Manning DS
Mont Law Rev; 2004; 65(1):309-41. PubMed ID: 16180295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Washington v. Glucksberg was tragically wrong.
Chemerinsky E
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1501-16. PubMed ID: 18595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The question remains: are there terminally ill patients who have a constitutional right to physician assistance in hastening the dying process.
Hermann DH
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1997; 1(3):445-93. PubMed ID: 15282883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Vacco v. Quill.
Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 9479885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The bell tolls for a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(15):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 9321541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Washington v. Glucksberg.
Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9479884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
Kamisar Y
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted suicide: the state versus the people.
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):261-79. PubMed ID: 16086510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'.
Carolan B
Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right.
Angell M
N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8970940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg?
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Socially-assisted dying and people with disabilities: some emerging legal, medical, and policy implications.
Blanck P; Kirschner K; Bienen L
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 9287469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Give me liberty and give me death: assisted suicide as a fundamental liberty interest.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1997; 6(2):527-50. PubMed ID: 16485372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional challenges to bans on "assisted suicide": the view from without and within.
Sedler RA
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1994; 21(3):777-97. PubMed ID: 11863027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is there a right to physician-assisted suicide?
Bleich JD
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 12455512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court's assisted suicide opinions in international perspective: avoiding a bureaucracy of death.
Underwood JL
N D Law Rev; 1997; 73(4):641-84. PubMed ID: 11660631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
