These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24353842)
1. Magnification error in digital radiographs of the cervical spine against magnetic resonance imaging measurements. Shigematsu H; Koizumi M; Yoneda M; Iida J; Oshima T; Tanaka Y Asian Spine J; 2013 Dec; 7(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24353842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical magnification error in lateral spinal digital radiographs. Ravi B; Rampersaud R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):E311-6. PubMed ID: 18449031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging be used to evaluate angular parameters in cervical spine? A comparison of multi-positional MRI to dynamic plain radiograph. Paholpak P; Tamai K; Shoell K; Sessumpun K; Buser Z; Wang JC Eur Spine J; 2018 May; 27(5):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 28948406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional turbo spin echo magnetic resonance imaging versus tomography for evaluating cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Oostveen JC; Roozeboom AR; van de Laar MA; Heeres J; den Boer JA; Lindeboom SF Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1237-44. PubMed ID: 9636977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation dose and magnification in pelvic X-ray: EOS™ imaging system versus plain radiographs. Chiron P; Demoulin L; Wytrykowski K; Cavaignac E; Reina N; Murgier J Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Dec; 103(8):1155-1159. PubMed ID: 28942025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation and differences in cervical sagittal alignment parameters between cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance images. Oshina M; Tanaka M; Oshima Y; Tanaka S; Riew KD Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1408-1415. PubMed ID: 29572735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Plain Anterior-Posterior Radiograph of the Pelvis Adequate for Assessment of Radiographic Implant Migration Evaluation in Total Hip Arthroplasty? Chong AC; MacFadden LN; Piatt BE; Noonan BC Iowa Orthop J; 2020; 40(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 32742209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography. Read RL; Duncan CG; Wallace AD; Perry JA; Duerr FM J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 241(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 22947163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans. Sieradzki JP; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Lazarus ML Eur Spine J; 2008 Sep; 17(9):1230-6. PubMed ID: 18661159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of radiographic measurements for subaxial cervical spine trauma. Bono CM; Schoenfeld A; Rampersaud R; Levi A; Grauer J; Arnold P; Fehlings M; Dvorak M; Vaccaro AR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21587104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic Cervical Radiographs in Patients with Hirayama Disease: An Unneglectable Factor on the Choice of Surgery Options. Wang H; Sun C; Yang S; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e433-e440. PubMed ID: 29530702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating. King RJ; Craig PR; Boreham BG; Majeed MA; Moran CG Injury; 2009 Feb; 40(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19095234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy. El Hage M; Bernard JP; Combescure C; Vazquez L Int J Dent; 2015; 2015():452413. PubMed ID: 26557851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision measurement of disc height, vertebral height and sagittal plane displacement from lateral radiographic views of the lumbar spine. Frobin W; Brinckmann P; Biggemann M; Tillotson M; Burton K Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1997; 12 Suppl 1():S1-S63. PubMed ID: 11430783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thresholds for human detection of patient setup errors in digitally reconstructed portal images of prostate fields. Phillips BL; Jiroutek MR; Tracton G; Elfervig M; Muller KE; Chaney EL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 12183001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI assessment of the importance of the acetabular labrum: a comparative radiographic and MRI study in children's hips. Carbonell PG; Peña MO J Pediatr Orthop B; 2017 Jul; 26(4):289-292. PubMed ID: 27832011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Kim YK; Park JY; Kim SG; Kim JS; Kim JD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 21239569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]