These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24354374)

  • 21. Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging.
    Bamberg F; Marcus RP; Becker A; Hildebrandt K; Bauner K; Schwarz F; Greif M; von Ziegler F; Bischoff B; Becker HC; Johnson TR; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K; Theisen D
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Mar; 7(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 24529887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Miki T; Koyama Y; Sato S; Kanazawa S; Ito H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149170. PubMed ID: 26894686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD.
    Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Min JK; Hachamovitch R; Abidov A; Germano G; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Thomson LE; Kang X; Slomka P; Rozanski A
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 54(2):177-200. PubMed ID: 20592682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Tamarappoo BK; Dey D; Nakazato R; Shmilovich H; Smith T; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Berman DS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1010-9. PubMed ID: 20947046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Feuchtner G; Goetti R; Plass A; Wieser M; Scheffel H; Wyss C; Stolzmann P; Donati O; Schnabl J; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Cury RC
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. First-arterial-pass dual-energy CT for assessment of myocardial blood supply: do we need rest, stress, and delayed acquisition? Comparison with SPECT.
    Meinel FG; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Nance JW; Silverman JR; Flowers BA; Henzler T
    Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):708-16. PubMed ID: 24475833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technical prerequisites and imaging protocols for dynamic and dual energy myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Cannaò PM; Schoepf UJ; Muscogiuri G; Wichmann JL; Fuller SR; Secchi F; Varga-Szemes A; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2401-10. PubMed ID: 25779223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Myocardial ischemia evaluation with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Delgado C; Vázquez M; Oca R; Vilar M; Trinidad C; Sanmartin M
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Nov; 66(11):864-70. PubMed ID: 24773993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Varga-Szemes A; Meinel FG; De Cecco CN; Fuller SR; Bayer RR; Schoepf UJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 25714277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model.
    Bamberg F; Hinkel R; Schwarz F; Sandner TA; Baloch E; Marcus R; Becker A; Kupatt C; Wintersperger BJ; Johnson TR; Theisen D; Klotz E; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 22178894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity.
    Bauer RW; Thilo C; Chiaramida SA; Vogl TJ; Costello P; Schoepf UJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 19620437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dipyridamole stress and rest transmural myocardial perfusion ratio evaluation by 64 detector-row computed tomography.
    Cury RC; Magalhães TA; Paladino AT; Shiozaki AA; Perini M; Senra T; Lemos PA; Cury RC; Rochitte CE
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 22146503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in young adults late after the arterial switch operation for d-transposition of the great arteries.
    Tobler D; Motwani M; Wald RM; Roche SL; Verocai F; Iwanochko RM; Greenwood JP; Oechslin EN; Crean AM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Dec; 16(1):98. PubMed ID: 25497205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dual-energy CT perfusion during pharmacologic stress for the assessment of myocardial perfusion defects using a second-generation dual-source CT: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kim SM; Chang SA; Shin W; Choe YH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 24424556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CT imaging of myocardial perfusion: possibilities and perspectives.
    Becker A; Becker C
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 20(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 23479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT myocardial perfusion: state of the science.
    Caruso D; DE Santis D; Schoepf UJ; Zerunian M; Eid M; Varga-Szemes A; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Laghi A; DE Cecco CN
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2017 Jun; 65(3):252-264. PubMed ID: 27958693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Cardiac hybrid imaging].
    Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Clin Res Cardiol Suppl; 2011 May; 6():32-42. PubMed ID: 22528176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by adenosine-stress CT perfusion imaging in pigs during various degrees of stenosis correlates well with coronary artery blood flow and fractional flow reserve.
    Rossi A; Uitterdijk A; Dijkshoorn M; Klotz E; Dharampal A; van Straten M; van der Giessen WJ; Mollet N; van Geuns RJ; Krestin GP; Duncker DJ; de Feyter PJ; Merkus D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Apr; 14(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 22843541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.