These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24354944)

  • 1. The effect of cognitive load on decision making with graphically displayed uncertainty information.
    Allen PM; Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1495-505. PubMed ID: 24354944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision making for risk management: a comparison of graphical methods for presenting quantitative uncertainty.
    Edwards JA; Snyder FJ; Allen PM; Makinson KA; Hamby DM
    Risk Anal; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2055-70. PubMed ID: 22616656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.
    ; Simianu VV; Grounds MA; Joslyn SL; LeClerc JE; Ehlers AP; Agrawal N; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Flaxman AD; Flum DR
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 27905926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Providing the Uncertainty Information About a Tornado Occurrence on the Weather Recipients' Cognition and Protective Action: Probabilistic Hazard Information Versus Deterministic Warnings.
    Miran SM; Ling C; Gerard A; Rothfusz L
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1533-1545. PubMed ID: 30791118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communicating weather forecast uncertainty: Do individual differences matter?
    Grounds MA; Joslyn SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 29595302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of different graphical displays on nonexpert decision making under uncertainty.
    Padilla LM; Hansen G; Ruginski IT; Kramer HS; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25437794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intuitive vs Deliberative Approaches to Making Decisions About Life Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rubin EB; Buehler AE; Cooney E; Gabler NB; Mante AA; Halpern SD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jan; 2(1):e187851. PubMed ID: 30681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
    Manigault AW; Handley IM; Whillock SR
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e37. PubMed ID: 25677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adolescents display distinctive tolerance to ambiguity and to uncertainty during risky decision making.
    van den Bos W; Hertwig R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40962. PubMed ID: 28098227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal policy for uncertainty estimation concurrent with decision making.
    Li X; Su R; Chen Y; Yang T
    Cell Rep; 2023 Mar; 42(3):112232. PubMed ID: 36924497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taxing cognitive capacities reduces choice consistency rather than preference: A model-based test.
    Olschewski S; Rieskamp J; Scheibehenne B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Apr; 147(4):462-484. PubMed ID: 29698025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
    Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Of matchers and maximizers: How competition shapes choice under risk and uncertainty.
    Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():78-98. PubMed ID: 25868112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty and denial: a resource-rational model of the value of information.
    Pierson E; Goodman N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113342. PubMed ID: 25426631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of uncertainty forecasts in complex decision tasks and various weather conditions.
    Joslyn SL; Grounds MA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 26479974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What eye-tracking methods can reveal about the role of information format in decision-aid processing: an exploratory study.
    Poirier MW; Decker C; Spertus JA; McDowd JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Nov; 102(11):1977-1984. PubMed ID: 31176556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of age and cognitive demand on motor decision making under uncertainty: a study on goal directed reaching movements.
    Krüger M; Puri R; Summers JJ; Hinder MR
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9119. PubMed ID: 38643224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of qualitative vs. quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision-making: a randomized trial.
    Man-Son-Hing M; O'Connor AM; Drake E; Biggs J; Hum V; Laupacis A
    Health Expect; 2002 Sep; 5(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 12199663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.