These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2435523)

  • 21. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of signals in modulated and unmodulated noise observed using auditory evoked potentials.
    Androulidakis AG; Jones SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1783-93. PubMed ID: 16793334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forward masking in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat.
    Gao F; Berrebi AS
    Brain Struct Funct; 2016 May; 221(4):2303-17. PubMed ID: 25921974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: wave V tuning curves.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 3558957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evoked-response tone-on-tone masking in the chinchilla: effect of masker frequency.
    Subramaniam M; Salvi RJ; Saunders SS; Boettcher FA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 2222289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory brainstem responses: masking related changes in wave VI.
    Reid A; Birchall JP; Moffat DA
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6722368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G; Matkei P
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7323676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components.
    Gott PS; Hughes EC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2465888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 7462466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency specificity of human auditory brainstem responses as revealed by pure-tone masking profiles.
    Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):919-24. PubMed ID: 6707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
    Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency-specific enhancement of the cochlear compound action potential: influence of the forward masker.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):197-202. PubMed ID: 1769914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory brainstem responses to tonal stimuli in young and aging rats.
    Cooper WA; Coleman JR; Newton EH
    Hear Res; 1990 Jan; 43(2-3):171-9. PubMed ID: 2312412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Masking effects on ABR waves I and V in infants and adults.
    Klein AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):755-9. PubMed ID: 3958315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The psychoacoustic phenomenon of masking level differences in the human subject studied by auditory evoked potentials].
    Kevanishvili ZSh; Lagidze ZP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1988; 38(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 3400318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA; Purdy SC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.