These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24355960)
21. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Farkas LG; Bryson W; Klotz J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1980 Sep; 66(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 7422721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation Assessment between Three-Dimensional Facial Soft Tissue Scan and Lateral Cephalometric Radiography in Orthodontic Diagnosis. Zecca PA; Fastuca R; Beretta M; Caprioglio A; Macchi A Int J Dent; 2016; 2016():1473918. PubMed ID: 27313615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A standardized nomenclature for craniofacial and facial anthropometry. Caple J; Stephan CN Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):863-79. PubMed ID: 26662189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair. Han K; Kwon HJ; Choi TH; Kim JH; Son D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 19482483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of natural head position on the assessment of facial morphology. Woźniak K; Piątkowska D; Lipski M Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(6):743-9. PubMed ID: 23457132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Influence of Clinical Experience and Photographic Presentation on Age Assessment of Women. Nielsen BR; Linneberg A; Christensen K; Forman JL; Schwarz P Gerontology; 2016; 62(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 26382945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs. Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of photographic assessment compared with standard anthropometric measurements in nonsynostotic cranial deformities. Schaaf H; Wilbrand JF; Boedeker RH; Howaldt HP Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Sep; 47(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 20507239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Applicability of a pre-established set of facial proportions from frontal photographs in forensic age estimation of a Brazilian population. Machado CEP; Santiago BM; Lima LNC; Gonzales PS; Franco A; Vidal FB; Aguilera IA; Guimarães MA Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 31176532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness. Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography]. Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses. Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study. Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach (vertical evaluation). Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 24047838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of craniofacial morphology in patients with obstructive sleep apnea using lateral cephalometry and dynamic MRI. Bharadwaj R; Ravikumar A; Krishnaswamy NR Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22484864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size. Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities. Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults. Kale-Varlk S J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]