336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24356166)
1. A randomized controlled comparison between combined spinal-epidural and single-shot spinal techniques in morbidly obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: time for initiation of anesthesia.
Ross VH; Dean LS; Thomas JA; Harris LC; Pan PH
Anesth Analg; 2014 Jan; 118(1):168-72. PubMed ID: 24356166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery.
Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients.
Ithnin F; Lim Y; Sia AT; Ocampo CE
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):577-80. PubMed ID: 16428564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined spinal epidural does not cause a higher sensory block than single shot spinal technique for cesarean delivery in laboring women.
Lim Y; Teoh W; Sia AT
Anesth Analg; 2006 Dec; 103(6):1540-2. PubMed ID: 17122236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison.
Tyagi A; Girotra G; Kumar A; Kumar S; Sethi AK; Mohta M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Jul; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19447598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study.
Tonidandel A; Booth J; D'Angelo R; Harris L; Tonidandel S
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2014 Nov; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 25201313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the baricity of bupivacaine influence intrathecal spread in the prolonged sitting position before elective cesarean delivery? A prospective randomized controlled study.
Loubert C; Hallworth S; Fernando R; Columb M; Patel N; Sarang K; Sodhi V
Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):811-7. PubMed ID: 21890887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a super morbidly obese parturient: A case report.
Cho A; So J; Ko EY; Choi D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21435. PubMed ID: 32756154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery.
Carvalho B; Collins J; Drover DR; Atkinson Ralls L; Riley ET
Anesthesiology; 2011 Mar; 114(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 21307769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension.
Coppejans HC; Hendrickx E; Goossens J; Vercauteren MP
Anesth Analg; 2006 Jan; 102(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 16368837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensorimotor anesthesia and hypotension after subarachnoid block: combined spinal-epidural versus single-shot spinal technique.
Goy RW; Sia AT
Anesth Analg; 2004 Feb; 98(2):491-496. PubMed ID: 14742393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paraesthesiae during needle-through-needle combined spinal epidural versus single-shot spinal for elective caesarean section.
McAndrew CR; Harms P
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2003 Oct; 31(5):514-7. PubMed ID: 14601273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of maternal position during induction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Yun EM; Marx GF; Santos AC
Anesth Analg; 1998 Sep; 87(3):614-8. PubMed ID: 9728840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound-Assisted Technology Versus the Conventional Landmark Location Method in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Obese Parturients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Li M; Ni X; Xu Z; Shen F; Song Y; Li Q; Liu Z
Anesth Analg; 2019 Jul; 129(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 30234528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.
Berends N; Teunkens A; Vandermeersch E; Van de Velde M
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2005; 56(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16013660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Preprocedural Ultrasound Increase the First-Pass Success Rate of Epidural Catheterization Before Cesarean Delivery? A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Tawfik MM; Atallah MM; Elkharboutly WS; Allakkany NS; Abdelkhalek M
Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):851-856. PubMed ID: 27183373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suprasternal Doppler estimation of cardiac output: standard versus sequential combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Bray JK; Fernando R; Patel NP; Columb MO
Anesth Analg; 2006 Oct; 103(4):959-64. PubMed ID: 17000812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anesthetic Considerations in the Obese Parturient.
Gaiser R
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 59(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 26694495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of sequential combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
Brizzi A; Greco F; Malvasi A; Valerio A; Martino V
Minerva Anestesiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):701-9. PubMed ID: 16278629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique].
Tanaka N; Ohkubo S; Takasaki M
Masui; 2004 Feb; 53(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 15011426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
