These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24356166)
1. A randomized controlled comparison between combined spinal-epidural and single-shot spinal techniques in morbidly obese parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: time for initiation of anesthesia. Ross VH; Dean LS; Thomas JA; Harris LC; Pan PH Anesth Analg; 2014 Jan; 118(1):168-72. PubMed ID: 24356166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of maximum cephalad sensory blockade with single-shot spinal compared with combined spinal-epidural techniques for cesarean delivery. Horstman DJ; Riley ET; Carvalho B Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 19095857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined spinal epidural causes higher level of block than equivalent single-shot spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean patients. Ithnin F; Lim Y; Sia AT; Ocampo CE Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):577-80. PubMed ID: 16428564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined spinal epidural does not cause a higher sensory block than single shot spinal technique for cesarean delivery in laboring women. Lim Y; Teoh W; Sia AT Anesth Analg; 2006 Dec; 103(6):1540-2. PubMed ID: 17122236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-shot spinal anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural and epidural volume extension for elective caesarean section: a randomized comparison. Tyagi A; Girotra G; Kumar A; Kumar S; Sethi AK; Mohta M Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Jul; 18(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19447598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study. Tonidandel A; Booth J; D'Angelo R; Harris L; Tonidandel S Int J Obstet Anesth; 2014 Nov; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 25201313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the baricity of bupivacaine influence intrathecal spread in the prolonged sitting position before elective cesarean delivery? A prospective randomized controlled study. Loubert C; Hallworth S; Fernando R; Columb M; Patel N; Sarang K; Sodhi V Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):811-7. PubMed ID: 21890887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a super morbidly obese parturient: A case report. Cho A; So J; Ko EY; Choi D Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21435. PubMed ID: 32756154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Carvalho B; Collins J; Drover DR; Atkinson Ralls L; Riley ET Anesthesiology; 2011 Mar; 114(3):529-35. PubMed ID: 21307769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Coppejans HC; Hendrickx E; Goossens J; Vercauteren MP Anesth Analg; 2006 Jan; 102(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 16368837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensorimotor anesthesia and hypotension after subarachnoid block: combined spinal-epidural versus single-shot spinal technique. Goy RW; Sia AT Anesth Analg; 2004 Feb; 98(2):491-496. PubMed ID: 14742393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paraesthesiae during needle-through-needle combined spinal epidural versus single-shot spinal for elective caesarean section. McAndrew CR; Harms P Anaesth Intensive Care; 2003 Oct; 31(5):514-7. PubMed ID: 14601273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of maternal position during induction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Yun EM; Marx GF; Santos AC Anesth Analg; 1998 Sep; 87(3):614-8. PubMed ID: 9728840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound-Assisted Technology Versus the Conventional Landmark Location Method in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Obese Parturients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Li M; Ni X; Xu Z; Shen F; Song Y; Li Q; Liu Z Anesth Analg; 2019 Jul; 129(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 30234528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia. Berends N; Teunkens A; Vandermeersch E; Van de Velde M Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2005; 56(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 16013660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Preprocedural Ultrasound Increase the First-Pass Success Rate of Epidural Catheterization Before Cesarean Delivery? A Randomized Controlled Trial. Tawfik MM; Atallah MM; Elkharboutly WS; Allakkany NS; Abdelkhalek M Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):851-856. PubMed ID: 27183373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suprasternal Doppler estimation of cardiac output: standard versus sequential combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Bray JK; Fernando R; Patel NP; Columb MO Anesth Analg; 2006 Oct; 103(4):959-64. PubMed ID: 17000812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anesthetic Considerations in the Obese Parturient. Gaiser R Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 59(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 26694495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of sequential combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Brizzi A; Greco F; Malvasi A; Valerio A; Martino V Minerva Anestesiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):701-9. PubMed ID: 16278629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of a lockable combined spinal-epidural device for use with needle-through-needle technique]. Tanaka N; Ohkubo S; Takasaki M Masui; 2004 Feb; 53(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 15011426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]