60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24356429)
1. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely?: a learning curve analysis.
Une D; Lapierre H; Sohmer B; Rai V; Ruel M
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 24356429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficacy of off-pump minimally invasive via a single left intercostal space incision compared with median sternotomy multi-vesselcoronary artery bypass grafting].
Huang GH; Zhang HJ; Chi LQ; You B; Bo P; Sun GL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 103(32):2516-2521. PubMed ID: 37650198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial.
Guo MH; Wells GA; Glineur D; Fortier J; Davierwala PM; Kikuchi K; Lemma MG; Mishra YK; McGinn J; Ramchandani M; Rabindra P; Nambala S; Chiu KM; Kiaii B; Gibson S; Ruel M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Mar; 78():140-145. PubMed ID: 30634037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Revascularization Be a Routine Approach?
Kyaruzi M; Gülmez H; Demirsoy E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Sep; 71(6):455-461. PubMed ID: 35644133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (mics cabg) for patients with coronary artery diseases and diabetes: a single center retrospective study.
Guangxin Z; Liqun C; Lin L; Jiaji L; Xiaolong M; Yuxiao Z; Qiuyue H; Qingyu K
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 38632609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing perioperative outcomes following off-pump multi-vessel minimally invasive via a single left intercostal space incision with median sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
Huang G; Zhang H; Chi L; You B; Bo P; Sun G
Perfusion; 2023 Sep; ():2676591231194454. PubMed ID: 37658740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MICS CABG: a single-center experience of the first 100 cases.
Rajput NK; Kalangi TKV; Andappan A; Swain AK
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Jan; 37(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 33442204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive strategies of surgical coronary artery revascularization for the aging population.
Rufa MI; Ursulescu A; Aktuerk D; Nagib R; Albert M; Göbel N; Shavahatli T; Franke UF
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2023 Oct; 64(5):534-540. PubMed ID: 37255493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Feasibility and Early Results of Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for All Comers.
Demirsoy E; Mavioglu I; Dogan E; Gulmez H; Dindar I; Erol MK
J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(17):. PubMed ID: 37685730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning Curve for No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Ge Y; Xia L; Wang L; Yang Z; Zhang Y; Du Y; Zhou E; Jiang H
Cardiology; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38565095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MICS CABG: Preoperative and perioperative evaluation.
Kaya U; Jalalzai I
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 40(2):268-269. PubMed ID: 38389774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mid-Term Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is the Early Learning Phase Detrimental?
Rodriguez ML; Lapierre HR; Sohmer B; Glineur D; Ruel M
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(2):116-120. PubMed ID: 28328569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical effects of coronary artery bypass grafting between left anterior small thoracotomy approach and lower-end sternal splitting approach.
Jinghui L; Yin Y; Xiaokaitijiang M; Yipeng T; Lianqun W; Yunpeng B; Zhejun Z; Nan J; Qiang W; Qingliang C; Dong X; Dongyan Y; Zhigang G; Feng Z
J Int Med Res; 2024 May; 52(5):3000605241247656. PubMed ID: 38818531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-vessel coronary artery grafting: analyzing the minimally invasive approach and its safety.
Ushioda R; Hirofuji A; Yoongtong D; Sakboon B; Cheewinmethasiri J; Lokeskrawee T; Patumanond J; Lawanaskol S; Kamiya H; Arayawudhikul N
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2024; 11():1391881. PubMed ID: 38774658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thirteen Years of Impactful, Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery: Short- and Long-Term Results for Single and Multi-Vessel Disease.
Ilcheva L; Häussler A; Cholubek M; Ntinopoulos V; Odavic D; Dushaj S; Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H; Dzemali O
J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive left internal mammary artery harvesting techniques during the learning curve are safe and achieve similar results as conventional LIMA harvesting techniques.
Masroor M; Chen C; Zhou K; Fu X; Khan UZ; Zhao Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(1):203. PubMed ID: 36002863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary artery bypass grafting via manubrium-sparing sternotomy in a patient with total laryngectomy and a permanent tracheostoma.
Imasaka KI; Onzuka T; Nomura R; Fukuda T; Hirata Y; Morita S; Shiose A
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jul; 38(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 35756556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical Challenges in Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Liu JJ; Kong QY; You B; Liang L; Xiao W; Ma XL; Pan F; Chi LQ
J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():1195613. PubMed ID: 35035305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: In the hands of the few, less is more.
Vervoort D; Deng MX; Fremes SE
JTCVS Tech; 2021 Dec; 10():168-169. PubMed ID: 34984376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonsternotomy multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: A key development in cardiac surgery.
Ruel M
JTCVS Tech; 2021 Dec; 10():162-167. PubMed ID: 34977721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
