246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24356754)
1. Total laparoscopic Wertheim's radical hysterectomy versus Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy in the management of stage I cervical cancer in Singapore: a pilot study.
Lim YK; Chia YN; Yam KL
Singapore Med J; 2013 Dec; 54(12):683-8. PubMed ID: 24356754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer in Singapore.
Lim TYK; Lin KKM; Wong WL; Aggarwal IM; Yam PKL
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2019; 8(2):53-58. PubMed ID: 31143623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Protopapas A; Jardon K; Bourdel N; Botchorishvili R; Rabischong B; Mage G; Canis M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 May; 19(4):712-22. PubMed ID: 19509577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program.
Zakashansky K; Chuang L; Gretz H; Nagarsheth NP; Rahaman J; Nezhat FR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1075-82. PubMed ID: 17386041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
