172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24356786)
1. Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.
Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Mar; 200(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 24356786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.
Penna M; Plaza A; Moreno-Gómez FN
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Aug; 199(8):723-33. PubMed ID: 23748250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
Penna M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrasting Propagation of Natural Calls of Two Anuran Species from the South American Temperate Forest.
Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134498. PubMed ID: 26230852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
Muñoz MI; Penna M
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vocal responses of austral forest frogs to amplitude and degradation patterns of advertisement calls.
Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN; Muñoz MI; Cisternas J
Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():190-201. PubMed ID: 28512036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correspondence between evoked vocal responses and auditory thresholds in Pleurodema thaul (Amphibia; Leptodactylidae).
Penna M; Velásquez N; Solís R
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Apr; 194(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 18214495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Call transmission efficiency in native and invasive anurans: competing hypotheses of divergence in acoustic signals.
Llusia D; Gómez M; Penna M; Márquez R
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77312. PubMed ID: 24155940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing acoustic communication active space in the Lusitanian toadfish.
Alves D; Amorim MC; Fonseca PJ
J Exp Biol; 2016 Apr; 219(Pt 8):1122-9. PubMed ID: 26896547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.
Liu J; Yang H; Hu GL; Li S; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Shen JX
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Oct; 201(10):1029-34. PubMed ID: 26260392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diversity of temporal response patterns in midbrain auditory neurons of frogs Batrachyla and its relevance for male vocal responses.
Penna M; Araya C; Cañete M
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 36136121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A broad filter between call frequency and peripheral auditory sensitivity in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster).
Green DM; Scolman T; Guthrie OW; Pasch B
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Aug; 205(4):481-489. PubMed ID: 31030219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory-vocal coupling in the naked mole-rat, a mammal with poor auditory thresholds.
Okanoya K; Yosida S; Barone CM; Applegate DT; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ; Park TJ
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2018 Nov; 204(11):905-914. PubMed ID: 30232547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory sexual difference in the large odorous frog Odorrana graminea.
Liu WR; Shen JX; Zhang YJ; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Xue MQ
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Apr; 200(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 24510208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex differences and androgen influences on midbrain auditory thresholds in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea.
Miranda JA; Wilczynski W
Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 252(1-2):79-88. PubMed ID: 19371774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propagation of natural toad calls in a Mediterranean terrestrial environment.
Penna M; Llusia D; Márquez R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):4025-31. PubMed ID: 23231131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
Bee MA; Schwartz JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2788-801. PubMed ID: 19894854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus.
Chen J; Jono T; Cui J; Yue X; Tang Y
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146677. PubMed ID: 26752301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
