BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24357145)

  • 1. Bioremediation of mine water.
    Klein R; Tischler JS; Mühling M; Schlömann M
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2014; 141():109-72. PubMed ID: 24357145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A case in support of implementing innovative bio-processes in the metal mining industry.
    Sánchez-Andrea I; Stams AJ; Weijma J; Gonzalez Contreras P; Dijkman H; Rozendal RA; Johnson DB
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2016 Jun; 363(11):. PubMed ID: 27190293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological manganese removal from acid mine drainage in constructed wetlands and prototype bioreactors.
    Hallberg KB; Johnson DB
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Feb; 338(1-2):115-24. PubMed ID: 15680632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient Low-pH Iron Removal by a Microbial Iron Oxide Mound Ecosystem at Scalp Level Run.
    Grettenberger CL; Pearce AR; Bibby KJ; Jones DS; Burgos WD; Macalady JL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 83(7):. PubMed ID: 28087535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A modular continuous flow reactor system for the selective bio-oxidation of iron and precipitation of schwertmannite from mine-impacted waters.
    Hedrich S; Johnson DB
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Feb; 106():44-9. PubMed ID: 22197072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage.
    Sánchez-Andrea I; Sanz JL; Bijmans MF; Stams AJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Mar; 269():98-109. PubMed ID: 24444599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of acid mine drainage chemistry and microbiology on the development of efficient Fe removal activities.
    Sharma S; Lee M; Reinmann CS; Pumneo J; Cutright TJ; Senko JM
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jun; 249():126117. PubMed ID: 32088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of antimony mine drainage: challenges and opportunities with special emphasis on mineral adsorption and sulfate reducing bacteria.
    Li Y; Hu X; Ren B
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(9):2039-51. PubMed ID: 27148704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biogeochemistry of the compost bioreactor components of a composite acid mine drainage passive remediation system.
    Johnson DB; Hallberg KB
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Feb; 338(1-2):81-93. PubMed ID: 15680629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metal and acidity fluxes controlled by precipitation/dissolution cycles of sulfate salts in an anthropogenic mine aquifer.
    Cánovas CR; Macías F; Pérez-López R
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 May; 188():29-43. PubMed ID: 26972101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long term performance of an AMD treatment bioreactor using chemolithoautotrophic sulfate reduction and ferrous iron precipitation under in situ groundwater conditions.
    Bilek F; Wagner S
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jan; 104():221-7. PubMed ID: 22133606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remediation and selective recovery of metals from acidic mine waters using novel modular bioreactors.
    Hedrich S; Johnson DB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):12206-12. PubMed ID: 25251612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathways of acid mine drainage to Clear Lake: implications for mercury cycling.
    Shipp WG; Zierenberg RA
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Dec; 18(8 Suppl):A29-54. PubMed ID: 19475917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrogeochemical features of surface water and groundwater contaminated with acid mine drainage (AMD) in coal mining areas: a case study in southern Brazil.
    Galhardi JA; Bonotto DM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Sep; 23(18):18911-27. PubMed ID: 27335014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovering iron and sulfate in the form of mineral from acid mine drainage by a bacteria-driven cyclic biomineralization system.
    Wang X; Jiang H; Zheng G; Liang J; Zhou L
    Chemosphere; 2021 Jan; 262():127567. PubMed ID: 32755692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sulfidogenic fluidized bed treatment of real acid mine drainage water.
    Sahinkaya E; Gunes FM; Ucar D; Kaksonen AH
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):683-9. PubMed ID: 20832297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-passive in-situ pilot scale bioreactor successfully removed sulfate and metals from mine impacted water under subarctic climatic conditions.
    Nielsen G; Hatam I; Abuan KA; Janin A; Coudert L; Blais JF; Mercier G; Baldwin SA
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():268-279. PubMed ID: 29723816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acid tolerance of an acid mine drainage bioremediation system based on biological sulfate reduction.
    Lu J; Chen T; Wu J; Wilson PC; Hao X; Qian J
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Nov; 102(22):10401-6. PubMed ID: 21967711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sulfate and metal removal in bioreactors treating acid mine drainage dominated with iron and aluminum.
    McCauley CA; O'Sullivan AD; Milke MW; Weber PA; Trumm DA
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):961-70. PubMed ID: 19070349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial community activities during establishment, performance, and decline of bench-scale passive treatment systems for mine drainage.
    Logan MV; Reardon KF; Figueroa LA; McLain JE; Ahmann DM
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4537-51. PubMed ID: 16213004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.