These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24357552)
21. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: part 2. Using predictive values and receiver operating characteristics in assessing diagnostic accuracy. Pretty IA; Maupomé G J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 May; 70(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 15132814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Experimental design and data analysis in receiver operating characteristic studies: lessons learned from reports in radiology from 1997 to 2006. Shiraishi J; Pesce LL; Metz CE; Doi K Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):822-30. PubMed ID: 19864510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The meaning and use of the volume under a three-class ROC surface (VUS). He X; Frey EC IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):577-88. PubMed ID: 18450532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ideal observers and optimal ROC hypersurfaces in N-class classification. Edwards DC; Metz CE; Kupinski MA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):891-5. PubMed ID: 15250641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fully automated, real-time, calibration-free, continuous noninvasive estimation of intracranial pressure in children. Fanelli A; Vonberg FW; LaRovere KL; Walsh BK; Smith ER; Robinson S; Tasker RC; Heldt T J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2019 Nov; 24(5):509-519. PubMed ID: 31443086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating the Impact of Different Suspicion of Infection Criteria on the Accuracy of Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores. Churpek MM; Snyder A; Sokol S; Pettit NN; Edelson DP Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1805-1812. PubMed ID: 28737573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Determining decision thresholds and evaluating indicators when conservation status is measured as a continuum. Connors BM; Cooper AB Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25155174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A decision tree built with parameters obtained by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography is useful for predicting adverse outcomes in non-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients. Jia D; Li XL; Zhang Q; Hou G; Zhou XM; Kang J Respir Res; 2019 Aug; 20(1):187. PubMed ID: 31426787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The ROC of Cox proportional hazards cure models with application in cancer studies. Zhang Y; Han X; Shao Y Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Apr; 27(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 33507457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic-based evaluation for survival outcomes. Song X; Zhou XH; Ma S Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2660-75. PubMed ID: 22987578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis. Terluin B; Eekhout I; Terwee CB; de Vet HC J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1388-96. PubMed ID: 25913670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MeningiSSS: A New Predictive Score to Support Decision on Invasive Procedures to Monitor or Manage the Intracerebral Pressure in Children with Bacterial Meningitis. Johansson Kostenniemi U; Karlsson L; Silfverdal SA; Mehle C Neurocrit Care; 2020 Apr; 32(2):586-595. PubMed ID: 31342450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On the Binormal Predictive Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for the Joint Assessment of Positive and Negative Predictive Values. Hughes G Entropy (Basel); 2020 May; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33286365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]