These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24358650)

  • 41. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique.
    Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In vivo effects of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
    Uysal T; Amasyali M; Ozcan S; Koyuturk AE; Akyol M; Sagdic D
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Sep; 55(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 20887516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Methods for bonding Incognito brackets using a photo-polymerizable bonding agent].
    Cuzin JF; Simon JS
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 19552881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A new approach to indirect bonding.
    Husain A; Ansari T; Mascarenhas R; Shetty S
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Oct; 43(10):652-4. PubMed ID: 20128195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17373220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. KommonBase for precise direct bonding of lingual orthodontic brackets.
    Komori A; Fujisawa M; Iguchi S
    Int Orthod; 2010 Mar; 8(1):14-27. PubMed ID: 20350710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.
    Miles PG
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Jul; 16(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11201964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The AccuBond system for indirect orthodontic bonding.
    Alpern MC; Primus C; Alpern AH
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Sep; 43(9):572-6; quiz 582. PubMed ID: 19904049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of flexural strength of orthodontic resin cement on bond strength of metal brackets to enamel surfaces.
    Li J
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 20937669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A modified direct technique versus conventional direct placement of brackets: in vitro bond strength comparison.
    McAlarney ME; Brenn P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 8249933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new device (FAQ.FIX®) for orthodontic bracket placement in straight wire technique.
    Mazzeo F; Marchese E; Assumma V; Sepe J; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Aug; 14():23. PubMed ID: 24325941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding.
    Thiyagarajah S; Spary DJ; Rock WP
    J Orthod; 2006 Sep; 33(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 16926313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Indirect bonding--a new transfer method.
    Wendl B; Droschl H; Muchitsch P
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 18276930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources.
    Koupis NS; Eliades T; Athanasiou AE
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 18298204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Custom base preaging in indirect bonding.
    Klocke A; Tadic D; Vaziri F; Kahl-Nieke B
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15038498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [New indirect method of orthodontic bracket application].
    Maino BG; Cociani S; Pagin P
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 2280790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Enhanced degree of monomer conversion of orthodontic adhesives using a glass-fiber layer under the bracket.
    Shinya M; Shinya A; Lassila LV; Varrela J; Vallittu PK
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):546-50. PubMed ID: 19413394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.