These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24358868)

  • 1. Laryngeal mask airway insertion by classic and thumb insertion technique: a comparison.
    Goyal M; Dutt A; Khan Joad AS
    F1000Res; 2013; 2():123. PubMed ID: 24358868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients.
    Krishna HM; Kamath S; Shenoy L
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Oct; 28(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23225929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Classic™ in terms of ease of insertion and hemodynamic response: A randomized observational study.
    Pratheeba N; Ramya GS; Ranjan RV; Remadevi R
    Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(3):521-525. PubMed ID: 27746545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
    Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
    Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E
    Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.
    Goyal R; Shukla RN; Kumar G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 22151106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airways: Laryngeal Mask Airway-classic and Laryngeal Mask Airway-proseal in Children.
    Bhat CB; Honnannavar KA; Patil MBP; Mudakanagoudar MS
    Anesth Essays Res; 2018; 12(1):119-123. PubMed ID: 29628566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults.
    Ali A; Canturk S; Turkmen A; Turgut N; Altan A
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1010-4. PubMed ID: 19707148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.
    Kim GW; Kim JY; Kim SJ; Moon YR; Park EJ; Park SY
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30611202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between LMA-Classic and AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation.
    Suzanna AB; Liu CY; Rozaidi SW; Ooi JS
    Med J Malaysia; 2011 Oct; 66(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 22299547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance].
    Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26363690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Prospective Comparison of Insertion Characteristics of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) ProSeal® Using Rotation Techniques vs Standard Techniques in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.
    Khutell A; Grover T; Singh A; Seth A; Madan M; Yadav K
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37976. PubMed ID: 37223173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cuff-pressure changes in LMA-Classic and the new Soft Seal laryngeal masks during nitrous oxide anaesthesia in spontaneous breathing patients.
    van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier EP
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):547-52. PubMed ID: 15318467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance.
    Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Supraglottic Airway Devices Classic, Fastrach and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy, Safety and Complications.
    Kömür E; Bakan N; Tomruk ŞG; Karaören G; Doğan ZT
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2015 Dec; 43(6):406-11. PubMed ID: 27366537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a new visual stylet (Discopo)-guided laryngeal mask airway placement vs conventional blind technique: a prospective randomized study.
    Zhao L; Zhang J; Zhou Q; Jiang W
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Dec; 35():85-89. PubMed ID: 27871600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in infants.
    Kim MS; Oh JT; Min JY; Lee KH; Lee JR
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Apr; 69(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 24641642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fiberoptic determination of the position of the laryngeal mask].
    Pothmann W; Füllekrug B; Schulte am Esch J
    Anaesthesist; 1992 Dec; 41(12):779-84. PubMed ID: 1489077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial.
    Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z
    Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.