These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24359305)

  • 21. Cyberbullying: Review of an Old Problem Gone Viral.
    Aboujaoude E; Savage MW; Starcevic V; Salame WO
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26095405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tackling psychosocial risk factors for adolescent cyberbullying: Evidence from a school-based intervention.
    Barkoukis V; Lazuras L; Ourda D; Tsorbatzoudis H
    Aggress Behav; 2016; 42(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 26350445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of short- and long-term cognitive empathy activation in preventing cyberbystander reinforcing cyberbullying behavior.
    Barlińska J; Szuster A; Winiewski M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Apr; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 25802977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?
    Slonje R; Smith PK
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Apr; 49(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18352984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Friendship selection and influence in bullying and defending: effects of moral disengagement.
    Sijtsema JJ; Rambaran JA; Caravita SC; Gini G
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Aug; 50(8):2093-104. PubMed ID: 24911569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combating weight-based cyberbullying on Facebook with the dissenter effect.
    Anderson J; Bresnahan M; Musatics C
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 May; 17(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 24690025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending.
    Caravita SC; Gini G; Pozzoli T
    Aggress Behav; 2012; 38(6):456-68. PubMed ID: 22898969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing children and adolescents engaged in cyberbullying to matched peers.
    Twyman K; Saylor C; Taylor LA; Comeaux C
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2010 Apr; 13(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 20528278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.
    Zhang Y; Lan X; Cui G; Wang J
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Sep; 37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. PubMed ID: 34157889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying.
    Obermann ML
    Aggress Behav; 2011; 37(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 21274851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.
    Thornberg R; Jungert T
    J Adolesc; 2013 Jun; 36(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 23522703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determinants of adolescents' active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying.
    Gini G; Albiero P; Benelli B; Altoè G
    J Adolesc; 2008 Feb; 31(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 17574660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.
    Kowalski RM; Giumetti GW; Schroeder AN; Lattanner MR
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Jul; 140(4):1073-137. PubMed ID: 24512111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Social Capital and Bystander Behavior in Bullying: Internalizing Problems as a Barrier to Prosocial Intervention.
    Jenkins LN; Fredrick SS
    J Youth Adolesc; 2017 Apr; 46(4):757-771. PubMed ID: 28130693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Qualitative analyses on the classification model of bystander behavior in cyberbullying.
    Rong K; Chu X; Zhao Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1152331. PubMed ID: 37496794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People: A Scoping Review of Social Media Studies.
    Hamm MP; Newton AS; Chisholm A; Shulhan J; Milne A; Sundar P; Ennis H; Scott SD; Hartling L
    JAMA Pediatr; 2015 Aug; 169(8):770-7. PubMed ID: 26098362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Online perspective-taking as an intervention tool against cyberbullying.
    Van Den Broeck E; Poels K; Vandebosch H; Van Royen K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 199():113-7. PubMed ID: 24875702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [How do adolescents in Germany define cyberbullying? A focus-group study of adolescents from a German major city].
    Höher J; Scheithauer H; Schultze-Krumbholz A
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2014; 63(5):361-78. PubMed ID: 24877777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parental Warmth, Friendship Quality, Empathy and Bystander Defending Behavior in Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in China.
    Li F; Gou C; Tang X; Qiu Y; Deng M; Ji X
    J Genet Psychol; 2024 Jul; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38965912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationships among cyberbullying, school bullying, and mental health in Taiwanese adolescents.
    Chang FC; Lee CM; Chiu CH; Hsi WY; Huang TF; Pan YC
    J Sch Health; 2013 Jun; 83(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 23586891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.