These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24359435)

  • 1. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation.
    Gączarzewicz D
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can the Sperm Class Analyser (SCA) CASA-Mot system for human sperm motility analysis reduce imprecision and operator subjectivity and improve semen analysis?
    Dearing C; Jayasena C; Lindsay K
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31056980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA). Reproducibility--online documentation--prognostic value].
    Krause W
    Fortschr Med; 1996 Dec; 114(34):470-3. PubMed ID: 9081898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Peng N; Zou X; Li L
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
    Amann RP; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) with IDENT stain to determine sperm concentration.
    Zinaman MJ; Uhler ML; Vertuno E; Fisher SG; Clegg ED
    J Androl; 1996; 17(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 8792219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen.
    Hansen C; Vermeiden T; Vermeiden JP; Simmet C; Day BC; Feitsma H
    Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2188-94. PubMed ID: 16920186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided sperm analysis: past, present and future.
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2014 May; 46(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 23550608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the accuracy of different sperm counting chambers by performing strict counts of photographed beads.
    Shiran E; Stoller J; Blumenfeld Z; Feigin PD; Makler A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Aug; 12(7):434-42. PubMed ID: 8574071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.