183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24360008)
1. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study.
Stuffken M; Vahidi F
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 26723098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simplifying and improving soft-tissue management for fixed-prosthodontic impressions.
Christensen GJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Feb; 144(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 23372137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry.
Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of gingival displacement, bleeding and ease of application for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and conventional retraction cord - a clinical trial.
Nasim H; Lone MA; Kumar B; Ahmed N; Farooqui WA; Alsahhaf A; Alresayes S; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Mar; 27(6):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 37013740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
