145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24360014)
1. A screw-connected sectional impression tray for patient with limited opening.
Paprocki GJ; Karunagaran S; Jain V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 24360014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
Fernandez MA; Paez de Mendoza CY; Platt JA; Levon JA; Hovijitra ST; Nimmo A
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a self-perforating impression tray for dental implants.
Marotti J; Tortamano P; Castilho TR; Steagall W; Wolfart S; Haselhuhn K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):843-8. PubMed ID: 24787129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
Beggs RJ
Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical report on the use of closed-tray, hex-lock-friction-fit implant impression copings.
Raviv E; Hanna J; Raviv R; Harel-Raviv M
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Aug; 40(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25106009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Pindex system in fabrication of the sectional custom tray.
Jabbari E; Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 24417537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A three-appointment alternative treatment protocol for fabricating an implant-supported milled bar overdenture.
Lin WS; Ozdemir E; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22304740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
Briley TF
Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin.
Castellani D; Basile M
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Amaral AL; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 20657873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
