These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24360014)

  • 41. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Fabricating a nonrotational angulated abutment for a single-tooth prosthesis.
    Reid PE; Zinner ID; Bhagat D
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 20009602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.
    Ansari IH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):569-71. PubMed ID: 7844762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predictable impression procedures for complete dentures.
    Felton DA; Cooper LF; Scurria MS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 40(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 8635625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Tray modification for making impressions of mobile teeth.
    Çomut AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):341-2. PubMed ID: 23684286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impression taking: still the key to great restorations.
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):452-3. PubMed ID: 23220297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Proper loading of impression tray minimizes inaccuracies.
    Beaumont AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):108. PubMed ID: 12239488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
    Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fabrication of a custom impression tray using a thermoplastic material as the tray spacer.
    Barrero C; Purdy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 16198183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.