241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24360790)
1. Polyaxial locking and compression screws improve construct stiffness of acetabular cup fixation: a biomechanical study.
Milne LP; Kop AM; Kuster MS
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1043-51. PubMed ID: 24360790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Locking versus standard screw fixation for acetabular cups: is there a difference?
Heller S; Brosh T; Kosashvili Y; Velkes S; Burg A; Dudkiewicz I
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 May; 133(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 23467767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fixed-angle screws vs standard screws in acetabular prosthesis fixation: a cadaveric biomechanical study.
Hugate RR; Dickey ID; Chen Q; Wood CM; Sim FH; Rock MG
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):806-14. PubMed ID: 18639433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the construct stability of the acetabular cup affected by the acetabular screw configuration in bone defect models?
Nam HJ; Lim YW; Jo WL; Bahk JH; Kwon SY; Park HC; AlShammari SM
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):354. PubMed ID: 37173688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary biomechanical study of different acetabular reinforcement devices for acetabular reconstruction.
Tai CL; Lee PY; Hsieh PH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121588. PubMed ID: 25799569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial stability of cementless acetabular cups: press-fit and screw fixation interaction--an in vitro biomechanical study.
Tabata T; Kaku N; Hara K; Tsumura H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Apr; 25(3):497-502. PubMed ID: 25421640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty using polyglycolide-lactide screws: an in vivo canine study.
Yee AJ; Protzner K; Fornasier VL; Binnington AG; Bogoch E; Davey JR
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 10884211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles.
Thanner J
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel method to assess primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups.
Crosnier EA; Keogh PS; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1126-34. PubMed ID: 25384445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical research on contour cage with transacetabular screws fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Wu H; Ma C; Ran J; Xu D; Liu A; Sun M; Wu L; Yan S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Aug; 47():117-122. PubMed ID: 28662423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ingrowth reduces implant-to-bone relative displacements in canine acetabular prostheses.
Heiner JP; Manley P; Kohles S; Ulm M; Bogart L; Vanderby R
J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 7931782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup.
Hsu JT; Chang CH; An KN; Zobitz ME; Phimolsarnti R; Hugate RR; Lai KA
Int Orthop; 2007 Aug; 31(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 16947050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.
Perona PG; Lawrence J; Paprosky WG; Patwardhan AG; Sartori M
J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1479374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of acetabular revision constructs: is pelvic discontinuity best treated with bicolumnar or traditional unicolumnar fixation?
Gililland JM; Anderson LA; Henninger HB; Kubiak EN; Peters CL
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jan; 28(1):178-86. PubMed ID: 22595181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do the cup surface properties influence the initial stability?
Goriainov V; Jones A; Briscoe A; New A; Dunlop D
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):757-62. PubMed ID: 24269067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial stability of press-fit acetabular components under rotational forces.
Fehring KA; Owen JR; Kurdin AA; Wayne JS; Jiranek WA
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1038-42. PubMed ID: 24238907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effects of bone-implant fitness and screw breakage on the stability and stress performance of the nonstemmed hip system.
Chen CM; Cheng CT; Lin CS; Lin SC; Chiang CC; Luo CA; Tseng CS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Feb; 29(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 24418222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limitation of total hip arthroplasty of the acetabular roof by press-fit without screw fixation: discussion of a biomechanical study.
Kanda A; Kaneko K; Obayashi O; Mogami A; Iwase H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 May; 23(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23412291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
