BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24361055)

  • 1. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
    Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
    Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
    Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrepancies Between Biopsy Gleason Score and Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Gleason Score: An Iranian Experience.
    Dolatkhah S; Mirtalebi M; Daneshpajouhnejad P; Barahimi A; Mazdak H; Izadpanahi MH; Mohammadi M; Taheri D
    Urol J; 2019 Feb; 16(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 30345499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
    Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
    Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Faraj SF; Bezerra SM; Yousefi K; Fedor H; Glavaris S; Han M; Partin AW; Humphreys E; Tosoian J; Johnson MH; Davicioni E; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE; Netto GJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146189. PubMed ID: 26731672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
    Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
    Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
    Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
    Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The modified International Society of Urological Pathology system improves concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy tumour grade.
    Hennes DMZB; Sewell J; Kerger M; Hovens CM; Peters JS; Costello AJ; Ryan A; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():45-51. PubMed ID: 34310033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should we abstain from Gleason score 2-4 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer? Results of a German multicentre study.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Wieland WF; Lebentrau S; Gunia S; Koch S; Gilfrich C; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M
    World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21191597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Helpap B; Egevad L
    Virchows Arch; 2006 Dec; 449(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 17091254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.