160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24361219)
1. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Needle and Catheter Size on Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Eisenbrey JR; Daecher A; Kramer MR; Forsberg F
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1961-8. PubMed ID: 26384606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of temperature, needle gauge and injection rate on the size distribution, concentration and acoustic responses of ultrasound contrast agents at high frequency.
Sun C; Panagakou I; Sboros V; Butler MB; Kenwright D; Thomson AJ; Moran CM
Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():84-91. PubMed ID: 27140502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study.
Hyvelin JM; Gaud E; Costa M; Helbert A; Bussat P; Bettinger T; Frinking P
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28240842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a Radiotherapeutic Megavoltage Beam on Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
Collado-Lara G; Heymans SV; Godart J; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J; Van Den Abeele K; Vos HJ; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 33810887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.
Moran CM; Watson RJ; Fox KA; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 12113791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of Definity and manipulated Definity populations.
Goertz DE; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1376-88. PubMed ID: 17521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.
Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Merton DA; Machado P; Liu JB; Miller C; Gonzalez JM; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Navarro V; Forsberg F
Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):890-7. PubMed ID: 21621239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume.
Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 20193957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonlinear resonance behavior and linear shell estimates for Definity™ and MicroMarker™ assessed with acoustic microbubble spectroscopy.
Helfield BL; Goertz DE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1158-68. PubMed ID: 23363132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thermal response of contrast agent microbubbles: preliminary results from physico-chemical and US-imaging characterization.
Guiot C; Pastore G; Napoleone M; Gabriele P; Trotta M; Cavalli R
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e127-30. PubMed ID: 17056082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal Control of SonoVue Microbubbles to Estimate Hydrostatic Pressure.
Nio AQX; Faraci A; Christensen-Jeffries K; Raymond JL; Monaghan MJ; Fuster D; Forsberg F; Eckersley RJ; Lamata P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Mar; 67(3):557-567. PubMed ID: 31634833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-speed optical observations and simulation results of SonoVue microbubbles at low-pressure insonation.
Chetty K; Stride E; Sennoga CA; Hajnal JV; Eckersley RJ
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008; 55(6):1333-42. PubMed ID: 18599421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-frequency (20 to 40 MHz) acoustic response of liquid-filled nanocapsules.
Jafari S; Diou O; Mamou J; Renault G; Fattal E; Tsapis N; Bridal SL
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 24402891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.
Moran CM; Arthur C; Quaia E
Tomography; 2022 Sep; 8(5):2285-2297. PubMed ID: 36136887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
