These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24361287)

  • 1. Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.
    Dickson PE; Calton MA; Mittleman G
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 261():158-70. PubMed ID: 24361287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The continuous performance test (rCPT) for mice: a novel operant touchscreen test of attentional function.
    Kim CH; Hvoslef-Eide M; Nilsson SR; Johnson MR; Herbert BR; Robbins TW; Saksida LM; Bussey TJ; Mar AC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Nov; 232(21-22):3947-66. PubMed ID: 26415954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of multidimensional visual stimuli by mice: intra- and extradimensional shifts.
    Brigman JL; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM; Rothblat LA
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 119(3):839-42. PubMed ID: 15998206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-related changes in visual acuity, learning and memory in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.
    Wong AA; Brown RE
    Neurobiol Aging; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1577-93. PubMed ID: 17010477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibitory control and response latency differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in a Go/No-Go and 5-choice serial reaction time task and strain-specific responsivity to amphetamine.
    Loos M; Staal J; Schoffelmeer AN; Smit AB; Spijker S; Pattij T
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 214(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 20580749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strains and stressors: an analysis of touchscreen learning in genetically diverse mouse strains.
    Graybeal C; Bachu M; Mozhui K; Saksida LM; Bussey TJ; Sagalyn E; Williams RW; Holmes A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87745. PubMed ID: 24586288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic and dopaminergic modulation of reversal learning in a touchscreen-based operant procedure for mice.
    Izquierdo A; Wiedholz LM; Millstein RA; Yang RJ; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM; Holmes A
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 171(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 16713639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strain and sex differences on olfactory discrimination learning in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice (Mus musculus).
    Mihalick SM; Langlois JC; Krienke JD
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Dec; 114(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 11149540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination learning and attentional set formation in a mouse model of Fragile X.
    Casten KS; Gray AC; Burwell RD
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 125(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 21517146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrasting cortical and subcortical activations produced by attentional-set shifting and reversal learning in humans.
    Rogers RD; Andrews TC; Grasby PM; Brooks DJ; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jan; 12(1):142-62. PubMed ID: 10769312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ultimate intra-/extra-dimensional attentional set-shifting task for mice.
    Scheggia D; Bebensee A; Weinberger DR; Papaleo F
    Biol Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 75(8):660-70. PubMed ID: 23810621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in passive avoidance in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J mice.
    Baarendse PJ; van Grootheest G; Jansen RF; Pieneman AW; Ogren SO; Verhage M; Stiedl O
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17696168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus specific deficit on visual reversal learning after lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in the mouse.
    Brigman JL; Rothblat LA
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 187(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 18022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different attentional abilities among inbred mice strains using virtual object recognition task (VORT): SNAP25⁺/⁻ mice as a model of attentional deficit.
    Braida D; Ponzoni L; Matteoli M; Sala M M
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():393-400. PubMed ID: 26300453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 5-choice continuous performance test: evidence for a translational test of vigilance for mice.
    Young JW; Light GA; Marston HM; Sharp R; Geyer MA
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(1):e4227. PubMed ID: 19156216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lesions of the dorsal noradrenergic bundle impair attentional set-shifting in the rat.
    Tait DS; Brown VJ; Farovik A; Theobald DE; Dalley JW; Robbins TW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3719-24. PubMed ID: 17610591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional set-shifting performance in schizophrenia: impact of distractors.
    Jazbec S; Pantelis C; Robbins T; Weickert T; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
    Schizophr Res; 2007 Jan; 89(1-3):339-49. PubMed ID: 17055703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress-induced disturbances in Morris water-maze performance: interstrain variability.
    Francis DD; Zaharia MD; Shanks N; Anisman H
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jul; 58(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7667428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Versatility of the mouse reversal/set-shifting test: effects of topiramate and sex.
    Bissonette GB; Lande MD; Martins GJ; Powell EM
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Dec; 107(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 22677721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional set-shifting in mice: modification of a rat paradigm, and evidence for strain-dependent variation.
    Colacicco G; Welzl H; Lipp HP; Würbel H
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 132(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 11853862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.