These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2436157)

  • 1. Muscle noise and interference behavior in pacemakers: a comparative study.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):125-32. PubMed ID: 2436157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of susceptibility of myopotential inhibition between AAI and VVI pacemakers.
    Ito H; Iesaka Y; Taniguchi K; Takeuchi J
    Jpn Heart J; 1987 Mar; 28(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 3599408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of myopotential interference in unipolar-bipolar programmable DDD pacemakers.
    Gabry MD; Behrens M; Andrews C; Wanliss M; Klementowicz PT; Furman S
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1322-30. PubMed ID: 2446279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevention of myopotential inhibition of unipolar QRS-inhibited demand pacemakers.
    Aida H
    Jpn J Surg; 1983 Nov; 13(6):470-9. PubMed ID: 6231402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pacemaker sensitivity to 50 Hz noise voltages.
    Irnich W; Steen-Mueller MK
    Europace; 2011 Sep; 13(9):1319-26. PubMed ID: 21551474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The response of implanted dual chamber pacemakers to 50 Hz extraneous electrical interference.
    Astridge PS; Kaye GC; Whitworth S; Kelly P; Camm AJ; Perrins EJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Oct; 16(10):1966-74. PubMed ID: 7694243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Myopotential inhibition of unipolar QRS-inhibited (VVI) pacemakers, assessed by ambulatory Holter monitoring of the electrocardiogram.
    Breivik K; Ohm OJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1980 Jul; 3(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 6160541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interference by cellular phones with permanent implanted pacemakers: an update.
    Hekmat K; Salemink B; Lauterbach G; Schwinger RH; Südkamp M; Weber HJ; Mehlhorn U
    Europace; 2004 Jul; 6(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15172661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones.
    Naegeli B; Osswald S; Deola M; Burkart F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 May; 27(6):1471-7. PubMed ID: 8626960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of demand pacemakers by skeletal muscle potentials.
    Winter DA
    JAMA; 1973 Jan; 223(5):527-9. PubMed ID: 4739136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers.
    Chen WH; Lau CP; Leung SK; Ho DS; Lee IS
    Clin Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11):881-6. PubMed ID: 8914782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myopotential inhibition of demand pacemakers.
    Piller LW; Kennelly BM
    Chest; 1974 Oct; 66(4):418-20. PubMed ID: 4414770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paradoxical atrial undersensing due to inappropriate atrial noise reversion of atrial fibrillation in dual-chamber pacemakers.
    Kolb C; Halbfass P; Zrenner B; Schmitt C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):696-700. PubMed ID: 16050825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Myopotential inhibition of demand pacemakers: etiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations.
    Berger R; Jacobs W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1979 Nov; 2(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 95221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by portable media players.
    Thaker JP; Patel MB; Jongnarangsin K; Liepa VV; Thakur RK
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Apr; 5(4):538-44. PubMed ID: 18329961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inapparent signals to demand pacemakers.
    Barold SS
    Chest; 1973 Apr; 63(4):467-8. PubMed ID: 4121119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference in pacemakers.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Nov; 7(6 Pt 1):1021-48. PubMed ID: 6209622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of elevated 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers: the role of the lead configuration and programming of the sensitivity.
    Toivonen L; Valjus J; Hongisto M; Metso R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Dec; 14(12):2114-22. PubMed ID: 1723194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on single chamber rate response and dual chamber pacemakers.
    Fetter J; Patterson D; Aram G; Hayes DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Sep; 12(9):1494-501. PubMed ID: 2476778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective atrial sensing in dual chamber pacemakers eliminates endless loop tachycardia.
    Klementowicz PT; Furman S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):590-4. PubMed ID: 3753992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.