These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24361686)

  • 1. Indexing the approximate number system.
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():147-55. PubMed ID: 24361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance.
    Matthews PG; Lewis MR; Hubbard EM
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 26710824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.
    Guillaume M; Gevers W; Content A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25742706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability.
    Guillaume M; Nys J; Mussolin C; Content A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 24096088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intergenerational associations in numerical approximation and mathematical abilities.
    Braham EJ; Libertus ME
    Dev Sci; 2017 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 27496658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.
    Chesney D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29651753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ratio effect slope can sometimes be an appropriate metric of the approximate number system sensitivity.
    Krajcsi A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2165-2176. PubMed ID: 31933171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental differences in approaches to nonsymbolic comparison tasks.
    Clayton S; Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):436-445. PubMed ID: 29419356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development.
    van Marle K; Chu FW; Li Y; Geary DC
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jul; 17(4):492-505. PubMed ID: 24498980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in algebraic cognition: Relation to the approximate number and semantic memory systems.
    Geary DC; Hoard MK; Nugent L; Rouder JN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Dec; 140():211-27. PubMed ID: 26255604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate numerical abilities and mathematics: Insight from correlational and experimental training studies.
    Hyde DC; Berteletti I; Mou Y
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():335-51. PubMed ID: 27339018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions.
    Leibovich T; Ansari D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 70(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 26913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence.
    Lourenco SF; Bonny JW; Fernandez EP; Rao S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(46):18737-42. PubMed ID: 23091023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dot Display Affects Approximate Number System Acuity and Relationships with Mathematical Achievement and Inhibitory Control.
    Norris JE; Castronovo J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155543. PubMed ID: 27195749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement.
    Holloway ID; Ansari D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 May; 103(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 18513738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory and number line representations in single-digit addition: Approximate versus exact, nonsymbolic versus symbolic.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1148-67. PubMed ID: 25337863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling from the mental number line: how are approximate number system representations formed?
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23831565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the approximate number system.
    Gilmore C; Attridge N; Inglis M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2099-109. PubMed ID: 21846265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.