204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2436172)
1. Chronotropic response of an activity detecting pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node.
Moura PJ; Gessman LJ; Lai T; Gallagher JD; White M; Morse DP
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):78-86. PubMed ID: 2436172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients.
Crook B; Nijhof P; van der Kemp P; Jennison C
Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of a minute ventilation sensing and activity sensing adaptive-rate pacemakers during daily activities.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Cheng CH; Lo CW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Sep; 12(9):1514-21. PubMed ID: 2476780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of rate response of an activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity.
Lau CP; Mehta D; Toff WD; Stott RJ; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Feb; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 2451223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement.
Lukl J; Doupal V; Sovová E; Lubena L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between heart rate and oxygen kinetics during constant workload exercise.
Kay GN; Ashar MS; Bubien RS; Dailey SM
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1853-60. PubMed ID: 8539152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is automatic mode switching effective for atrial arrhythmias occurring at different rates? A study of the efficacy of automatic mode and rate switching to simulated atrial arrhythmias by chest wall stimulation.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Lam CT; Tse HF; Lee K; Chan WK; Leung Z
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 May; 23(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 10833701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Activitrax--a pacemaker with a regulated rhythm rate].
Sadowski Z; Zalas K; Srzednicki M; Heybowicz J; Kośmicki M; Pałko T
Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32(10-12):434-9. PubMed ID: 2638421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing.
Faerestrand S; Breivik K; Ohm OJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1277-90. PubMed ID: 2446275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Ricci R; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Spampinato A; Pignalberi C; Bellocci F; Adinolfi E; Dini P; Cavaglià S; De Seta F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1719-23. PubMed ID: 8945030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occurrence of significant long PR intervals in patients implanted for sinus node dysfunction and monitored with SafeR™: The PRECISE study.
Taieb J; Le Franc P; Khattar P; Moubarak G; Gorka H; Godenir JP; Deutsch P; Degand B; Al Daoud A; Elkaim JP; Elbaz N; Merlo S; Lellouche N
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Mar; 112(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 30594571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
Sukhum P
Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity.
Sulke AN; Pipilis A; Henderson RA; Bucknall CA; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1990 Jul; 64(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 2390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing.
Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Brandes A; Haase H; Katus HA; Potratz J
Heart; 1999 Jun; 81(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 10336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DDI pacing: indications, expectations, and follow-up.
Irwin M; Harris L; Cameron D; Louis C; Radvanszky E; Goldman B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 1):274-9. PubMed ID: 7513851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
