These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2436172)
1. Chronotropic response of an activity detecting pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node. Moura PJ; Gessman LJ; Lai T; Gallagher JD; White M; Morse DP Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 1):78-86. PubMed ID: 2436172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The chronotropic response of the sinus node to exercise: a new method of analysis and a study of pacemaker patients. Crook B; Nijhof P; van der Kemp P; Jennison C Eur Heart J; 1995 Jul; 16(7):993-8. PubMed ID: 7498217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of a minute ventilation sensing and activity sensing adaptive-rate pacemakers during daily activities. Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Cheng CH; Lo CW Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Sep; 12(9):1514-21. PubMed ID: 2476780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of rate response of an activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity. Lau CP; Mehta D; Toff WD; Stott RJ; Ward DE; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Feb; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 2451223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of rate responsive atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Hatano K; Kato R; Hayashi H; Noda S; Sotobata I; Murase M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan; 12(1 Pt 1):16-24. PubMed ID: 2464806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers. Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence. Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with indications for primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement. Lukl J; Doupal V; Sovová E; Lubena L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Sep; 22(9):1284-91. PubMed ID: 10527009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between heart rate and oxygen kinetics during constant workload exercise. Kay GN; Ashar MS; Bubien RS; Dailey SM Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1853-60. PubMed ID: 8539152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is automatic mode switching effective for atrial arrhythmias occurring at different rates? A study of the efficacy of automatic mode and rate switching to simulated atrial arrhythmias by chest wall stimulation. Leung SK; Lau CP; Lam CT; Tse HF; Lee K; Chan WK; Leung Z Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 May; 23(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 10833701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Activitrax--a pacemaker with a regulated rhythm rate]. Sadowski Z; Zalas K; Srzednicki M; Heybowicz J; Kośmicki M; Pałko T Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32(10-12):434-9. PubMed ID: 2638421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing. Faerestrand S; Breivik K; Ohm OJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1277-90. PubMed ID: 2446275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ricci R; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Spampinato A; Pignalberi C; Bellocci F; Adinolfi E; Dini P; Cavaglià S; De Seta F Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1719-23. PubMed ID: 8945030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occurrence of significant long PR intervals in patients implanted for sinus node dysfunction and monitored with SafeR™: The PRECISE study. Taieb J; Le Franc P; Khattar P; Moubarak G; Gorka H; Godenir JP; Deutsch P; Degand B; Al Daoud A; Elkaim JP; Elbaz N; Merlo S; Lellouche N Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2019 Mar; 112(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 30594571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview. Sukhum P Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity. Sulke AN; Pipilis A; Henderson RA; Bucknall CA; Sowton E Br Heart J; 1990 Jul; 64(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 2390399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing. Wiegand UK; Bode F; Schneider R; Brandes A; Haase H; Katus HA; Potratz J Heart; 1999 Jun; 81(6):580-5. PubMed ID: 10336914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DDI pacing: indications, expectations, and follow-up. Irwin M; Harris L; Cameron D; Louis C; Radvanszky E; Goldman B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Mar; 17(3 Pt 1):274-9. PubMed ID: 7513851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]