These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24361994)

  • 1. Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lee YC; Langley CH; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):804-16. PubMed ID: 24361994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Andolfatto P
    Genome Res; 2007 Dec; 17(12):1755-62. PubMed ID: 17989248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
    Sattath S; Elyashiv E; Kolodny O; Rinott Y; Sella G
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001302. PubMed ID: 21347283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chong Z; Zhai W; Li C; Gao M; Gong Q; Ruan J; Li J; Jiang L; Lv X; Hungate E; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Dec; 30(12):2699-708. PubMed ID: 24077769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring the Frequency Spectrum of Derived Variants to Quantify Adaptive Molecular Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Keightley PD; Campos JL; Booker TR; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):975-84. PubMed ID: 27098912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Akashi H
    Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):1067-76. PubMed ID: 7713409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Codon Usage Selection Can Bias Estimation of the Fraction of Adaptive Amino Acid Fixations.
    Matsumoto T; John A; Baeza-Centurion P; Li B; Akashi H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1580-9. PubMed ID: 26873577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Major role of positive selection in the evolution of conservative segments of Drosophila proteins.
    Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 279(1742):3409-17. PubMed ID: 22673359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes.
    Bachtrog D
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():334. PubMed ID: 19091130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping Selection within Drosophila melanogaster Embryo's Anatomy.
    Salvador-Martínez I; Coronado-Zamora M; Castellano D; Barbadilla A; Salazar-Ciudad I
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 29040697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species.
    Andolfatto P; Wong KM; Bachtrog D
    Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():114-28. PubMed ID: 21173424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of drosophila: selection and geographic differentiation.
    Begun DJ; Aquadro CF
    Genetics; 1994 Jan; 136(1):155-71. PubMed ID: 8138153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nurminsky D; Aguiar DD; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
    Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):128-30. PubMed ID: 11141564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.
    Fay JC; Wyckoff GJ; Wu CI
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6875):1024-6. PubMed ID: 11875569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlated evolution of nearby residues in Drosophilid proteins.
    Callahan B; Neher RA; Bachtrog D; Andolfatto P; Shraiman BI
    PLoS Genet; 2011 Feb; 7(2):e1001315. PubMed ID: 21383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila.
    Aguadé M
    Genetics; 1999 Jun; 152(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 10353898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polymorphism and divergence at the prune locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Simmons GM; Kwok W; Matulonis P; Venkatesh T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Jul; 11(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 8078405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution under a model of functionally buffered deleterious mutations can lead to positive selection in protein-coding genes.
    Shen R; Wenzel M; Messer PW; Aquadro CF
    Evolution; 2023 Oct; 77(10):2200-2212. PubMed ID: 37464886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila.
    Sawyer SA; Parsch J; Zhang Z; Hartl DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Apr; 104(16):6504-10. PubMed ID: 17409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic effects of nucleotide substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
    Kern AD; Jones CD; Begun DJ
    Genetics; 2002 Dec; 162(4):1753-61. PubMed ID: 12524346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.