157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24362310)
1. Why breeding values estimated using familial data should not be used for genome-wide association studies.
Ekine CC; Rowe SJ; Bishop SC; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Feb; 4(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 24362310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical considerations regarding the use of genotype and pedigree data to model relatedness in the context of genome-wide association studies.
Cheng R; Parker CC; Abney M; Palmer AA
G3 (Bethesda); 2013 Oct; 3(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 23979941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of phenotypic- and Estimated Breeding Values (EBV) to dissect the genetic architecture of complex traits in a Scots pine three-generation pedigree design.
Calleja-Rodriguez A; Li Z; Hallingbäck HR; Sillanpää MJ; Wu HX; Abrahamsson S; García-Gil MR
J Theor Biol; 2019 Feb; 462():283-292. PubMed ID: 30423305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis.
Aulchenko YS; de Koning DJ; Haley C
Genetics; 2007 Sep; 177(1):577-85. PubMed ID: 17660554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast Genome-Wide QTL Association Mapping on Pedigree and Population Data.
Zhou H; Blangero J; Dyer TD; Chan KK; Lange K; Sobel EM
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):174-186. PubMed ID: 27943406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ghost QTL and hotspots in experimental crosses: novel approach for modeling polygenic effects.
Wallin J; Bogdan M; Szulc PA; Doerge RW; Siegmund DO
Genetics; 2021 Mar; 217(3):. PubMed ID: 33789342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian QTL analyses using pedigreed families of an outcrossing species, with application to fruit firmness in apple.
Bink MC; Jansen J; Madduri M; Voorrips RE; Durel CE; Kouassi AB; Laurens F; Mathis F; Gessler C; Gobbin D; Rezzonico F; Patocchi A; Kellerhals M; Boudichevskaia A; Dunemann F; Peil A; Nowicka A; Lata B; Stankiewicz-Kosyl M; Jeziorek K; Pitera E; Soska A; Tomala K; Evans KM; Fernández-Fernández F; Guerra W; Korbin M; Keller S; Lewandowski M; Plocharski W; Rutkowski K; Zurawicz E; Costa F; Sansavini S; Tartarini S; Komjanc M; Mott D; Antofie A; Lateur M; Rondia A; Gianfranceschi L; van de Weg WE
Theor Appl Genet; 2014 May; 127(5):1073-90. PubMed ID: 24567047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting dominant QTL with variance component analysis in simulated pedigrees.
Rowe SJ; Pong-Wong R; Haley CS; Knott SA; De Koning DJ
Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Aug; 90(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 18840310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of identity-by-state information for the accuracy of genomic selection.
Luan T; Woolliams JA; Odegård J; Dolezal M; Roman-Ponce SI; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):28. PubMed ID: 22937985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power of in silico QTL mapping from phenotypic, pedigree, and marker data in a hybrid breeding program.
Yu J; Arbelbide M; Bernardo R
Theor Appl Genet; 2005 Apr; 110(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 15754207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci detection in livestock populations.
Kolbehdari D; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR; Allen BO
J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16706924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping genomic regions affecting milk traits in Sarda sheep by using the OvineSNP50 Beadchip and principal components to perform combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium analysis.
Usai MG; Casu S; Sechi T; Salaris SL; Miari S; Sechi S; Carta P; Carta A
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):65. PubMed ID: 31744455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-trait meta-analyses reveal 25 quantitative trait loci for economically important traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
Fang ZH; Pausch H
BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):695. PubMed ID: 31481029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-wide association analysis in domestic animals: a powerful approach for genetic dissection of trait loci.
Andersson L
Genetica; 2009 Jun; 136(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 18704695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
