These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24362392)

  • 1. Continuous curricular feedback: a formative evaluation approach to curricular improvement.
    Goldfarb S; Morrison G
    Acad Med; 2014 Feb; 89(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 24362392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A course assessment process for curricular quality improvement.
    Peterson SL; Wittstrom KM; Smith MJ
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2011 Oct; 75(8):157. PubMed ID: 22102747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fostering Student-Faculty Partnerships for Continuous Curricular Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.
    Scott KW; Callahan DG; Chen JJ; Lynn MH; Cote DJ; Morenz A; Fisher J; Antoine VL; Lemoine ER; Bakshi SK; Stuart J; Hundert EM; Chang BS; Gooding H
    Acad Med; 2019 Jul; 94(7):996-1001. PubMed ID: 30920449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From feedback to reciprocity. Developing a student-centered approach to course evaluation.
    Louie B; Byrne N; Wasylenki D
    Eval Health Prof; 1996 Jun; 19(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 10186912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a revised curriculum: a four-year qualitative study of student perceptions.
    Lanning SK; Wetzel AP; Baines MB; Ellen Byrne B
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Oct; 76(10):1323-33. PubMed ID: 23066131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effecting curricular change through comprehensive course assessment: using structure and process to change outcomes.
    Goldman EF; Swayze SS; Swinehart SE; Schroth WS
    Acad Med; 2012 Mar; 87(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 22373621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phase 1 of a comprehensive course review process: program innovation.
    Skelton J; West KP; Zeff T
    J Dent Educ; 2002 Mar; 66(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 11936231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Student Curriculum Review Team: How we catalyze curricular changes through a student-centered approach.
    Hsih KW; Iscoe MS; Lupton JR; Mains TE; Nayar SK; Orlando MS; Parzuchowski AS; Sabbagh MF; Schulz JC; Shenderov K; Simkin DJ; Vakili S; Vick JB; Xu T; Yin O; Goldberg HR
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(11):1008-12. PubMed ID: 25532595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing the master educator: cross disciplinary teaching scholars program for human and veterinary medical faculty.
    Srinivasan M; Pratt DD; Collins J; Bowe CM; Stevenson FT; Pinney SJ; Wilkes MS
    Acad Psychiatry; 2007; 31(6):452-64. PubMed ID: 18079507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustaining curricular change at Sherbrooke through external, formative program evaluations.
    Des Marchais JE; Bordage G
    Acad Med; 1998 May; 73(5):494-503. PubMed ID: 9609858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empowerment evaluation: a collaborative approach to evaluating and transforming a medical school curriculum.
    Fetterman DM; Deitz J; Gesundheit N
    Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):813-20. PubMed ID: 20520033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A step-by-step approach to curriculum review.
    Davenport NC; Spath ML; Blauvelt MJ
    Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(4):181-5. PubMed ID: 19574860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How we conduct ongoing programmatic evaluation of our medical education curriculum.
    Karpa K; Abendroth CS
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(10):783-6. PubMed ID: 22816980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparing faculty members for significant curricular revisions in a school of dental medicine.
    Spallek H; O'Donnell JA; Yoo YI
    J Dent Educ; 2010 Mar; 74(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 20203328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introducing clinical laboratory science: CLS students help shape the future.
    Sawyer BG; Hubbard J; Rice-Spearman L
    Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(4):206-13. PubMed ID: 17181124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drivers of Dashboard Development (3-D): A Curricular Continuous Quality Improvement Approach.
    Shroyer AL; Lu WH; Chandran L
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 26796088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?
    Henzi D; Davis E; Jasinevicius R; Hendricson W
    J Dent Educ; 2007 May; 71(5):632-45. PubMed ID: 17493972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development and implementation of an online applied biochemistry bridge course for a dental hygiene curriculum.
    Gadbury-Amyot CC; Overman PR; Crain G
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Jan; 73(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 19126769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation tools for dual track adult and gerontology nurse practitioner students.
    Cotter VT; Bradway CK; Cross D; Taylor MA
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 Dec; 21(12):658-62. PubMed ID: 19958416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HannibaL - the model curriculum at Hannover Medical School: targets, implementation and experiences.
    Paulmann V; Fischer V; Just I
    GMS J Med Educ; 2019; 36(5):Doc57. PubMed ID: 31815167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.