These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24364220)

  • 21. [Evaluation of the cavity cleaning of ultrasonic instruments and slow-speed handpiece in posterior teeth root-end preparation].
    Zhang PJ; Chen WX; Zeng QX; Xie FF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2013 Apr; 22(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 23708028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the cleanliness of a new ultrasonic root end preparation.
    Chou HG; Lin CP; Kuo JC; Lan WH
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 Sep; 96(9):727-33. PubMed ID: 9308327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of bur type on microtensile bond strengths of self-etching systems to human dentin.
    Dias WR; Pereira PN; Swift EJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 15536849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effects of different instruments in root-end preparation: scanning electron microscopic evaluation].
    Zhang PJ; Chen WX; Zeng QX; Xie FF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 18784872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
    Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing.
    Ferrazzano GF; Ingenito A; Alcidi B; Sangianantoni G; Schiavone MG; Cantile T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 29380610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of rotary instrumentation on composite bond strength with simulated pulpal pressure.
    Gupta R; Tewari S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 16827021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of Smear Layers Created by Different Burs on Durability of Self-Etching Adhesive Bond to Dentin of Primary Teeth.
    Rirattanapong P; Senawongse P; Harnirattisal C; Wunsiw W
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 26208066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs.
    Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Greene TD; Moss ME; Lee HJ; Ben-Hanan U; Graser GN; Barzilay I
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15032891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two ultrasonic cleaning units for deterioration of cutting edges and debris removal on dental burs.
    Villaseñor A; Hill SD; Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 1338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of ultrasonic root end preparation on resected root surfaces: SEM evaluation.
    Taschieri S; Testori T; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):611-8. PubMed ID: 15529135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The effect of cavity finishing on the initial sealing capacity of amalgam fillings in vitro].
    Haller B; Klaiber B; Tens KD
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(8):986-92. PubMed ID: 1882221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving fissure sealant quality: mechanical preparation and filling level.
    Geiger SB; Gulayev S; Weiss EI
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 10856805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface roughness and wettability of enamel and dentine surfaces prepared with different dental burs.
    Al-Omari WM; Mitchell CA; Cunningham JL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 11422697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison between two root end preparation techniques in human cadavers.
    Wuchenich G; Meadows D; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 1994 Jun; 20(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 7931024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of bur blade concentricity on high-speed tooth-cutting interactions: a video-rate confocal microscopic study.
    Watson TF; Cook RJ
    J Dent Res; 1995 Nov; 74(11):1749-55. PubMed ID: 8530736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Leakage in amalgam restorations. The influence of preparation with tungsten carbide burs and diamond burs].
    Ben Amar A; Horacio Cháves R; Fitzig S; Klich N
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1987 Apr; 75(2):42, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 2853428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping.
    Piacentini C; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8540483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.