These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24364687)

  • 21. Confidence and memory: assessing positive and negative correlations.
    Roediger HL; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 23721250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The hobgoblin of consistency: algorithmic judgment strategies underlie inflated self-assessments of performance.
    Williams EF; Dunning D; Kruger J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 104(6):976-94. PubMed ID: 23627747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: a diffusion model approach.
    Miller J; Schwarz W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):394-412. PubMed ID: 16634678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Origins of the sample-size effect in explicit evaluative judgment.
    Kaufmann M; Betsch T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(5):344-53. PubMed ID: 19447750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blind insight: metacognitive discrimination despite chance task performance.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z; Barrett AB; Bor D; Seth AK
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2199-208. PubMed ID: 25384551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Naïve point estimation.
    Lindskog M; Winman A; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):782-800. PubMed ID: 22905935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R; Ackerman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1624-37. PubMed ID: 24707787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interaction between self-efficacy and initial performance in predicting the complexity of task chosen.
    Tabernero C; Wood RE
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1167-80. PubMed ID: 20229920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptive decision making in a dynamic environment: a test of a sequential sampling model of relative judgment.
    Vuckovic A; Kwantes PJ; Neal A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 24059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.
    Olsson AC; Enkvist T; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1371-84. PubMed ID: 17087590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?
    Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):781-99. PubMed ID: 26059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relations among self-efficacy, goal setting, and metacognitive experiences in problem-solving.
    Akama K
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Jun; 98(3):895-907. PubMed ID: 16933693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.
    Borst JP; Taatgen NA; van Rijn H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):363-82. PubMed ID: 20192536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.
    Ishiwa K; Sanjosé V; Otero J
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Sep; 83(Pt 3):502-20. PubMed ID: 23822534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference.
    Markovits H; Brunet ML; Thompson V; Brisson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23206167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking.
    Thompson VA; Turner JA; Pennycook G; Ball LJ; Brack H; Ophir Y; Ackerman R
    Cognition; 2013 Aug; 128(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 23158572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.