These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Using the attention cascade model to probe cognitive aging. Shih SI Psychol Aging; 2009 Sep; 24(3):550-62. PubMed ID: 19739911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis. He J; McCarley JS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of timing in the attentional boost effect. Swallow KM; Jiang YV Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):389-404. PubMed ID: 21264720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010). Lavie N; Torralbo A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Tsal Y; Benoni H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1645-56. PubMed ID: 20822300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities. Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working memory costs of task switching. Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach. Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective attention and perceptual load in autism spectrum disorder. Remington A; Swettenham J; Campbell R; Coleman M Psychol Sci; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1388-93. PubMed ID: 19843262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition. Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients. Gil-Gómez de Liaño B; Umiltà C; Stablum F; Tebaldi F; Cantagallo A Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 20846773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech. Francis AL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]