These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24364725)

  • 1. Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.
    Weisberg SM; Schinazi VR; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF; Epstein RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):669-682. PubMed ID: 24364725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):768-785. PubMed ID: 26595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.
    Brunyé TT; Wood MD; Houck LA; Taylor HA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 27156528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.
    Boone AP; Gong X; Hegarty M
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):909-922. PubMed ID: 29790097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charting the development of cognitive mapping.
    Nazareth A; Weisberg SM; Margulis K; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jun; 170():86-106. PubMed ID: 29453130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in the allocation of visual attention during navigation.
    Keller M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 33764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A slippery directional slope: Individual differences in using slope as a directional cue.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):648-61. PubMed ID: 24338529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.
    Brunyé TT; Holmes A; Cantelon J; Eddy MD; Gardony AL; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(15):1175-9. PubMed ID: 25144391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map.
    Kluss T; Marsh WE; Zetzsche C; Schill K
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():271-6. PubMed ID: 26239752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task.
    Stites MC; Matzen LE; Gastelum ZN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Mar; 5(1):13. PubMed ID: 32198712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
    Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience.
    Padilla LM; Creem-Regehr SH; Stefanucci JK; Cashdan EA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):582-590. PubMed ID: 27714666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real world navigation independence in the early blind correlates with differential brain activity associated with virtual navigation.
    Halko MA; Connors EC; Sánchez J; Merabet LB
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jun; 35(6):2768-78. PubMed ID: 24027192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wakeful rest promotes the integration of spatial memories into accurate cognitive maps.
    Craig M; Dewar M; Harris MA; Della Sala S; Wolbers T
    Hippocampus; 2016 Feb; 26(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 26235141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Presence, Performance, and Behavior between Real, Remote, and Virtual Immersive Environments.
    Khenak N; Vezien J; Bourdot P
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Dec; 26(12):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 32976103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.
    Youngson NL; Vollebregt M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 30883177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of electronic map displays and individual differences in ability on navigation performance.
    Rodes W; Gugerty L
    Hum Factors; 2012 Aug; 54(4):589-99. PubMed ID: 22908682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial navigation in elderly healthy subjects, amnestic and non amnestic MCI patients.
    Rusconi ML; Suardi A; Zanetti M; Rozzini L
    J Neurol Sci; 2015 Dec; 359(1-2):430-7. PubMed ID: 26478129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in route-learning strategy and associated working memory resources.
    Baldwin CL; Reagan I
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 19750798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving cognitive mapping by training for people with a poor sense of direction.
    Ishikawa T; Zhou Y
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):39. PubMed ID: 32804308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.