BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24364810)

  • 1. The offline production effect.
    Jamieson RK; Spear J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Mar; 68(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 24364810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.
    Ozubko JD; Macleod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1543-7. PubMed ID: 20804284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ; Hockley WE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 27244357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production improves memory equivalently following elaborative vs non-elaborative processing.
    Forrin ND; Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):470-80. PubMed ID: 23705973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
    Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
    Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging and the production effect: a test of the distinctiveness account.
    Lin OY; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 22686153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The production effect: delineation of a phenomenon.
    MacLeod CM; Gopie N; Hourihan KL; Neary KR; Ozubko JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):671-85. PubMed ID: 20438265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.
    Forrin ND; Groot B; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1090-111. PubMed ID: 26820499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding context and false recognition memories.
    Bruce D; Phillips-Grant K; Conrad N; Bona S
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 15615315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The production effect: costs and benefits in free recall.
    Jones AC; Pyc MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):300-5. PubMed ID: 23751006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sense of agency over speech and proneness to auditory hallucinations: the reality-monitoring paradigm.
    Sugimori E; Asai T; Tanno Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):169-85. PubMed ID: 20544560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can fluency be interpreted as novelty? Retraining the interpretation of fluency in recognition memory.
    Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):653-64. PubMed ID: 22250906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory and the Korsakoff syndrome: not remembering what is remembered.
    d'Ydewalle G; Van Damme I
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):905-20. PubMed ID: 17005214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality.
    Besken M; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 24016138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?
    Lafleur A; Boucher VJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():139-46. PubMed ID: 26141662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluency effects in recognition memory: are perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency interchangeable?
    Lanska M; Olds JM; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 24001021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the influence of continuous babble on auditory short-term memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA; Craik FI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):735-51. PubMed ID: 17853231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.