191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365109)
1. Optimization of resazurin-based viability staining for quantification of microbial biofilms.
Van den Driessche F; Rigole P; Brackman G; Coenye T
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Mar; 98():31-4. PubMed ID: 24365109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pros and cons of using resazurin staining for quantification of viable Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a screening assay.
Sandberg ME; Schellmann D; Brunhofer G; Erker T; Busygin I; Leino R; Vuorela PM; Fallarero A
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jul; 78(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 19427338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates.
Peeters E; Nelis HJ; Coenye T
J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Feb; 72(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 18155789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorescent assay based on resazurin for detection of activity of disinfectants against bacterial biofilm.
Mariscal A; Lopez-Gigosos RM; Carnero-Varo M; Fernandez-Crehuet J
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 82(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 19198831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new colorimetric microtitre model for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.
Toté K; Vanden Berghe D; Maes L; Cos P
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 46(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 18069978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dynamic resazurin microassay allowing accurate quantification of cells and suitable for acid-forming bacteria.
Labadie M; Randrianjatovo-Gbalou I; Zaidi-Ait-Salem M; Dossat-Létisse V; Fontagné-Faucher C; Marcato-Romain CE
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Apr; 183():106172. PubMed ID: 33610595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining conditions for biofilm inhibition and eradication assays for Gram-positive clinical reference strains.
Cruz CD; Shah S; Tammela P
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):173. PubMed ID: 30390625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying implant-associated biofilms: Comparison of microscopic, microbiologic and biochemical methods.
Doll K; Jongsthaphongpun KL; Stumpp NS; Winkel A; Stiesch M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():61-68. PubMed ID: 27444546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Microplate-Based System as In Vitro Model of Biofilm Growth and Quantification.
Vandecandelaere I; Van Acker H; Coenye T
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1333():53-66. PubMed ID: 26468099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the XTT and resazurin assays for quantification of the metabolic activity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm.
Alonso B; Cruces R; Pérez A; Sánchez-Carrillo C; Guembe M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():135-137. PubMed ID: 28587857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Anti-candidal activity of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains and in vitro inhibition of Candida biofilm formation].
Keçeli Özcan S; Dündar D; Sönmez Tamer G
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2012 Jan; 46(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22399170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida tropicalis biofilms against fluconazole using calorimetric indicator resazurin.
Punithavathy PM; Nalina K; Menon T
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 22499305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans is variably affected by saliva and dietary sugars.
Jin Y; Samaranayake LP; Samaranayake Y; Yip HK
Arch Oral Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(10):789-98. PubMed ID: 15308423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three methods to study biofilm formation by clinical strains of Escherichia coli.
Crémet L; Corvec S; Batard E; Auger M; Lopez I; Pagniez F; Dauvergne S; Caroff N
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2013 Mar; 75(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 23313082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Macroscale versus microscale methods for physiological analysis of biofilms formed in 96-well microtiter plates.
Gomes LC; Moreira JM; Miranda JM; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 24140575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automation of the resazurin reduction test using fluorometry of microtitration trays.
Ali-Vehmas T; Louhi M; Sandholm M
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1991 Jul; 38(5):358-72. PubMed ID: 1927150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeting Biofilm Associated Staphylococcus aureus Using Resazurin Based Drug-susceptibility Assay.
Dalecki AG; Crawford CL; Wolschendorf F
J Vis Exp; 2016 May; (111):. PubMed ID: 27214174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of resazurin to detect mefloquine as an efflux-pump inhibitor in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.
Vidal-Aroca F; Meng A; Minz T; Page MG; Dreier J
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Nov; 79(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 19799939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a quantitative real-time PCR assay and comparison with fluorescence microscopy and selective agar plate counting for species-specific quantification of an in vitro subgingival biofilm model.
Ammann TW; Bostanci N; Belibasakis GN; Thurnheer T
J Periodontal Res; 2013 Aug; 48(4):517-26. PubMed ID: 23278531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of biofilm-forming ability of bacterial strains isolated from the roof of an old house.
Jardak M; Abdelli F; Laadhar R; Lami R; Stien D; Aifa S; Mnif S
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 63(3):186-194. PubMed ID: 28502956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]