These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365542)
1. Rats average entire vectors when navigating toward a hidden goal: a test of the vector sum model in rodents. Gibson B; McGowan F Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():18-24. PubMed ID: 24365542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Solving for two unknowns: an extension of vector-based models of landmark-based navigation. Sturz BR; Cooke SP; Bodily KD J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jul; 37(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 21744982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a geometric rule or absolute vectors: landmark use by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). Kelly DM; Kippenbrock S; Templeton J; Kamil AC Brain Res Bull; 2008 Jun; 76(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18498944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Entorhinal cortex lesions impair the use of distal but not proximal landmarks during place navigation in the rat. Parron C; Poucet B; Save E Behav Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 154(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 15313022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: an additive effect between its components. Chamizo VD; Rodrigo T; Peris JM; Grau M J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 16834501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for a shift from place navigation to directional responding in one variant of the Morris water task. Hamilton DA; Akers KG; Johnson TE; Rice JP; Candelaria FT; Redhead ES J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 19364235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: the role of proximity to the goal. Chamizo VD; Manteiga RD; Rodrigo T; Mackintosh NJ Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16338101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks. Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal. Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential control of navigation by locale and taxon cues in the Morris water task. Hamilton DA; Rosenfelt CS; Whishaw IQ Behav Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 154(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 15313026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic field polarity fails to influence the directional signal carried by the head direction cell network and the behavior of rats in a task requiring magnetic field orientation. Tryon VL; Kim EU; Zafar TJ; Unruh AM; Staley SR; Calton JL Behav Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 126(6):835-44. PubMed ID: 23025828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Size does not matter, but features do: Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh features more heavily than geometry in large and small enclosures. Lambinet V; Wilzeck C; Kelly DM Behav Processes; 2014 Feb; 102():3-11. PubMed ID: 24378211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rats' orientation is more important than start point location for successful place learning. Skinner DM; Horne MR; Murphy KE; Martin GM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 20141321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic visual information plays a critical role for spatial navigation in water but not on solid ground. Sautter CS; Cocchi L; Schenk F Behav Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 194(2):242-5. PubMed ID: 18682262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Route and landmark learning by rats searching for food. Tamara C; Timberlake W Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21044664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rats with hippocampal lesion show impaired learning and memory in the ziggurat task: a new task to evaluate spatial behavior. Faraji J; Lehmann H; Metz GA; Sutherland RJ Behav Brain Res; 2008 May; 189(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18192033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of salient and non-salient visuospatial cues by rats in the Morris Water Maze. Young GS; Choleris E; Kirkland JB Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):794-9. PubMed ID: 16516936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons. Sawa K; Leising KJ; Blaisdell AP J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 16045391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of local visual cues for spatial orientation in terrestrial toads (Rhinella arenarum): The role of distance to a goal. Daneri MF; Casanave EB; Muzio RN J Comp Psychol; 2015 Aug; 129(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 26147701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]