BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365863)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of histamine receptor-2 antagonist versus proton pump inhibitor for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients*.
    MacLaren R; Campbell J
    Crit Care Med; 2014 Apr; 42(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 24365863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-Effectiveness of Histamine
    Hammond DA; Kathe N; Shah A; Martin BC
    Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Jan; 37(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 27809338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor versus placebo in critically ill patients (SUP-ICU trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Krag M; Perner A; Wetterslev J; Wise MP; Borthwick M; Bendel S; Pelosi P; Keus F; Guttormsen AB; Schefold JC; Møller MH;
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17(1):205. PubMed ID: 27093939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis: stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists.
    Barkun AN; Adam V; Martel M; Bardou M
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 23337211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress-related mucosal bleeding in critically ill oncology patients.
    Bruno JJ; Canada TW; Wakefield CD; Nates JL
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2009 Mar; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 18753185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kantorova I; Svoboda P; Scheer P; Doubek J; Rehorkova D; Bosakova H; Ochmann J
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(57):757-61. PubMed ID: 15143910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis.
    Lin PC; Chang CH; Hsu PI; Tseng PL; Huang YB
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1197-205. PubMed ID: 20173630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proton pump inhibitors versus histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alhazzani W; Alenezi F; Jaeschke RZ; Moayyedi P; Cook DJ
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):693-705. PubMed ID: 23318494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis.
    Barletta JF; Bruno JJ; Buckley MS; Cook DJ
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):1395-405. PubMed ID: 27163192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care unit patients given proton pump inhibitor or histamine-2 receptor antagonist for prevention of stress ulcer: a Meta analysis].
    Zhou JF; Wan XY; Huang W; Han LL
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2010 Apr; 22(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 20398466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a clinical pharmacist stress ulcer prophylaxis management program on inappropriate use in hospitalized patients.
    Buckley MS; Park AS; Anderson CS; Barletta JF; Bikin DS; Gerkin RD; O'Malley CW; Wicks LM; Garcia-Orr R; Kane-Gill SL
    Am J Med; 2015 Aug; 128(8):905-13. PubMed ID: 25820164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time to declare a moratorium on stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill.
    Alaniz C; Hyzy RC
    Crit Care Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):e636-7. PubMed ID: 25126822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proton pump inhibitors or histamine-2 receptor antagonists for the prevention of recurrences of erosive reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Harris RA; Kuppermann M; Richter JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Dec; 92(12):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9399748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Withholding Pantoprazole for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-Analysis.
    Alhazzani W; Guyatt G; Alshahrani M; Deane AM; Marshall JC; Hall R; Muscedere J; English SW; Lauzier F; Thabane L; Arabi YM; Karachi T; Rochwerg B; Finfer S; Daneman N; Alshamsi F; Zytaruk N; Heel-Ansdell D; Cook D;
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Jul; 45(7):1121-1129. PubMed ID: 28459708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.
    MacLaren R; Reynolds PM; Allen RR
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Apr; 174(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 24535015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress ulcer prophylaxis: it's that same old wine in a brand new bottle*.
    Erstad BL
    Crit Care Med; 2014 Apr; 42(4):979-80. PubMed ID: 24633095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of intravenous versus oral proton pump inhibitors in peptic ulcer hemorrhage.
    Spiegel BM; Dulai GS; Lim BS; Mann N; Kanwal F; Gralnek IM
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Aug; 4(8):988-997. PubMed ID: 16844422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histamine 2 receptor antagonists vs intravenous proton pump inhibitors in a pediatric intensive care unit: a comparison of gastric pH.
    Tofil NM; Benner KW; Fuller MP; Winkler MK
    J Crit Care; 2008 Sep; 23(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 18725049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine 2 receptor antagonists for stress-related mucosal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.
    Barkun AN; Bardou M; Pham CQ; Martel M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Apr; 107(4):507-20; quiz 521. PubMed ID: 22290403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of prescriber perceptions about the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding in the intensive care unit.
    Preslaski CR; Mueller SW; Kiser TH; Fish DN; MacLaren R
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Dec; 39(6):658-62. PubMed ID: 25243327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.