These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

914 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365893)

  • 1. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decompression and interspinous dynamic stabilization using the locker for lumbar canal stenosis associated with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Lee DY; Lee SH; Shim CS; Lee HY
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Jun; 53(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 20809452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sasai K; Umeda M; Maruyama T; Wakabayashi E; Iida H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Dec; 9(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 19035747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Herno A; Saari T; Suomalainen O; Airaksinen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):1010-4. PubMed ID: 10332794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year follow-up after decompressive surgery with and without implantation of an interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective controlled study.
    Richter A; Halm HF; Hauck M; Quante M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Aug; 27(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 22643187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.
    Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G; Parisini P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 20081518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.
    Richter A; Schütz C; Hauck M; Halm H
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19967546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up.
    Kikuike K; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Shimizu K
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 19956034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Routine postoperative imaging early after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective evaluation.
    Schubert GA; Diepers M; Hegewald AA; Seiz M; Thomé C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):E1263-8. PubMed ID: 23778369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
    Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
    Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.