283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365896)
1. Microendoscopy-assisted muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical results of consecutive 105 cases with more than 3-year follow-up.
Yoshimoto M; Miyakawa T; Takebayashi T; Ida K; Tanimoto K; Kawamura S; Yamashita T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E318-25. PubMed ID: 24365896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
Kelleher MO; Timlin M; Persaud O; Rampersaud YR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term Results of Microendoscopic Muscle-preserving Interlaminar Decompression versus Spinal Process Splitting Laminectomy.
Fukushi R; Yoshimoto M; Iesato N; Terashima Y; Takebayashi T; Yamashita T
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 79(6):511-517. PubMed ID: 29294509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate of revision surgery after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Nemani VM; Aichmair A; Taher F; Lebl DR; Hughes AP; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E326-31. PubMed ID: 24299718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. mild Interlaminar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: procedure description and case series with 1-year follow-up.
Wong WH
Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 22673487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis].
Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note.
Ikuta K; Arima J; Tanaka T; Oga M; Nakano S; Sasaki K; Goshi K; Yo M; Fukagawa S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 May; 2(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 15945442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term clinical and radiological postoperative outcomes after an interspinous microdecompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Jalil Y; Carvalho C; Becker R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 24365893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
