141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24365896)
21. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up.
Kikuike K; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Shimizu K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 19956034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Microendoscopic decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Yang B; Chen R; Xie P; Liu B; Dong J; Rong L
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 25(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 22069964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term follow-up of revision decompressive lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients.
Shabat S; Arinzon Z; Gepstein R; Folman Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 21519302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.
Long H; Kazunasa U; Liu S; Akio S; Taito I
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 18069464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Micro-decompression procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis].
Zhang GL; Ge BF; Gong TJ; Wang YH; Chen KM; Qian J
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct; 22(10):751-3. PubMed ID: 19902751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A ligamentum flavum-preserving approach to the lumbar spinal canal.
Askar Z; Wardlaw D; Choudhary S; Rege A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(19):E385-90. PubMed ID: 14520050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF
Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microendoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disk herniation: less surgical invasiveness and minimum 2-year follow-up results.
Yoshimoto M; Iwase T; Takebayashi T; Ida K; Yamashita T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Feb; 27(1):E1-7. PubMed ID: 23429311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Dohzono S; Matsumura A; Terai H; Toyoda H; Suzuki A; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 May; 18(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 23521685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bacterial wound contamination during simple and complex spinal procedures. A prospective clinical study.
Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou CM; Politis AN; Batzaleksis NA; Katonis PG; Xenakis TA
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22122837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.
Chopko B; Caraway DL
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
