These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24368220)
1. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations. Osugi T; Murakami I Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search. Osugi T; Murakami I Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking. Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks. von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search. Osugi T; Kumada T; Kawahara J Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 19275913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients. Osugi T; Kawahara JI Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking. Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Out with the old: inhibition of old items in a preview search is limited. Emrich SM; Ruppel JD; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1552-7. PubMed ID: 19064497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The preview benefit for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Persike M; Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G Vision Res; 2013 Jul; 87():1-9. PubMed ID: 23694681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of noise on the contrast detection threshold in visual perception. Sasaki H; Todorokihara M; Ishida T; Miyachi J; Kitamura T; Aoki R Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 16996210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Jiang Y; Chun MM; Marks LE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):717-30. PubMed ID: 12075898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impairment in preattentive visual processing in patients with Parkinson's disease. Lieb K; Brucker S; Bach M; Els T; Lücking CH; Greenlee MW Brain; 1999 Feb; 122 ( Pt 2)():303-13. PubMed ID: 10071058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]