280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24369295)
1. Influence of in vitro assay pH and extractant composition on As bioaccessibility in contaminated soils.
Smith E; Scheckel K; Miller BW; Weber J; Juhasz AL
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():171-7. PubMed ID: 24369295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of arsenic bioaccessibility in housedust and contaminated soils based on four in vitro assays.
Li HB; Li J; Zhu YG; Juhasz AL; Ma LQ
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 532():803-11. PubMed ID: 26136157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Juhasz AL; Weber J; Smith E; Naidu R; Rees M; Rofe A; Kuchel T; Sansom L
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9487-94. PubMed ID: 20000545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils: Coupling in vitro assays with sequential and HNO3 extraction.
Li SW; Li J; Li HB; Naidu R; Ma LQ
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Sep; 295():145-52. PubMed ID: 25897696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo relative bioavailability in 12 contaminated soils: Method comparison and method development.
Li J; Li K; Cui XY; Basta NT; Li LP; Li HB; Ma LQ
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 532():812-20. PubMed ID: 26116410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability associated with as in vivo-in vitro correlations when using different bioaccessibility methodologies.
Juhasz AL; Smith E; Nelson C; Thomas DJ; Bradham K
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11646-53. PubMed ID: 25157927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beryllium in contaminated soils: Implication of beryllium bioaccessibility by different exposure pathways.
Islam MR; Sanderson P; Naidu R; Payne TE; Johansen MP; Bari ASMF; Rahman MM
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Jan; 421():126757. PubMed ID: 34352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lead bioaccessibility in 12 contaminated soils from China: Correlation to lead relative bioavailability and lead in different fractions.
Li J; Li K; Cave M; Li HB; Ma LQ
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Sep; 295():55-62. PubMed ID: 25911623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effect of Different Iron Minerals on Bioaccessibility of Soil Arsenic Using
Zhong SX; Yin GC; Huang RL; He HF; Chen ZL; Lin QT; Wang WK
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 29965595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo-in vitro and XANES spectroscopy assessments of lead bioavailability in contaminated periurban soils.
Smith E; Kempson IM; Juhasz AL; Weber J; Rofe A; Gancarz D; Naidu R; McLaren RG; Gräfe M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):6145-52. PubMed ID: 21707121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of in vivo relative bioavailability to in vitro bioaccessibility for arsenic in household dust from China and its implication for human exposure assessment.
Li HB; Li J; Juhasz AL; Ma LQ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):13652-9. PubMed ID: 25365687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioaccessible arsenic in soils of former sugar cane plantations, Island of Hawaii.
Cutler WG; Brewer RC; El-Kadi A; Hue NV; Niemeyer PG; Peard J; Ray C
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 442():177-88. PubMed ID: 23178778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of oral bioaccessibility of arsenic in playground soil in Madrid (Spain): a three-method comparison and implications for risk assessment.
Mingot J; De Miguel E; Chacón E
Chemosphere; 2011 Sep; 84(10):1386-91. PubMed ID: 21601908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils using meta analysis and relative bioavailability-bioaccessibility regression models.
Juhasz AL; Weber J; Smith E
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10676-83. PubMed ID: 22059522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability of arsenic bioaccessibility and metabolism in soils by human gut microbiota using different in vitro methods combined with SHIME.
Yin N; Du H; Zhang Z; Cai X; Li Z; Sun G; Cui Y
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 566-567():1670-1677. PubMed ID: 27320743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can in vitro assays account for interactions between inorganic co-contaminants observed during in vivo relative bioavailability assessment?
Ollson CJ; Smith E; Juhasz AL
Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():348-355. PubMed ID: 29096308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arsenic bioaccessibility in CCA-contaminated soils: influence of soil properties, arsenic fractionation, and particle-size fraction.
Girouard E; Zagury GJ
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2576-85. PubMed ID: 19211134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying statistical relationships between commonly used in vitro models for estimating lead bioaccessibility.
Yan K; Dong Z; Liu Y; Naidu R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(7):6873-82. PubMed ID: 26670029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interconnected soil iron and arsenic speciation effects on arsenic bioaccessibility and bioavailability: a scoping review.
Sowers TD; Nelson CM; Blackmon MD; Jerden ML; Kirby AM; Diamond GL; Bradham KD
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2022 Jan; 25(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 34706629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the predictive capabilities of the Sbrc-G in vitro assay for estimating arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Juhasz AL; Herde P; Herde C; Boland J; Smith E
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12962-9. PubMed ID: 25310703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
